The experience of metroplasty at the stage of delivery in pregnant women with two cesarean section operations in the anamnesis



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The purpose of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness of metroplasty at the stage of abdominal delivery in women with a history of two cesarean section operations
Materials and methods. From 2020 to 2022, 150 pregnant women were examined. The patients were divided into 3 groups: the first group - pregnant women with a history of cesarean section, the second group – pregnant women with two cesarean sections. In these groups, metroplasty was performed at the stage of delivery. The third control group consisted of pregnant women with a history of two cesarean sections who underwent surgical delivery without excision of scar tissue in the lower segment.
Metroplasty was performed before fetal extraction with a whole fetal bladder in accordance with the patent "Method of metroplasty during operative delivery in women with two or more cesarean sections".
In order to study the dynamics of changes in scar thickness, all women underwent ultrasound examination 2 hours later, on the third day after delivery, and 6 months after delivery.
The results of the study. Resection of the scar area on the uterus during repeated cesarean section improves the residual thickness of the myometrium, which is determined by ultrasound 6 months after surgery. This technique allows you to form a functionally consistent scar on the uterus after two cesarean section operations.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Kristina Tarasova

Bashkir State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: krisval2017@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9807-5945

врач акушер-гинеколог, аспирант

Russian Federation

Ilnur I. Musin

Bashkir State Medical University

Email: ilnur-musin@yandex.ru

PhD, Associate Professor, Department of obstetrics and gynecology with IPE course

Alfiya G. Yaschuk

Bashkir State Medical University

Email: alfiya_galimovna@mail.ru

Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Head of the Department of obstetrics and gynecology with IPE course

References

  1. Literature
  2. Ye J, Betrán AP, Guerrero Vela M, Souza JP, Zhang J. Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary cesarean delivery. Birth. 2014 Sep;41(3):237-44. doi: 10.1111/birt.12104. Epub 2014 Apr 11. PMID: 24720614.
  3. Tulandi T, Cohen A. Emerging Manifestations of Cesarean Scar Defect in Reproductive-aged Women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):893-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.06.020. Epub 2016 Jul 5. PMID: 27393285.
  4. Zemskova N.Yu., Chechneva M.A., Petrukhin V.A., Lukashenko S.Yu. Ultrasound examination of the uterine scar after cesarean section in the prognosis of pregnancy outcome. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2020; 10: 99-104 https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.10.99-104
  5. Vuchenovich Yu.D., Novikova V.A., Kostin I.N., Radzinsky V.E. Risks of scar failure and attempts at vaginal delivery after cesarean section // Obstetrics and gynecology: news, opinions, training. 2019. Vol. 7, No. 3. Appendix. pp. 93-100. doi: 10.24411/2303-9698-2019-13913
  6. Sidorova, T. A. Risk factors and mechanisms of formation of scar defects on the uterus after cesarean section / T. A. Sidorova, S. A. Martynov // Gynecology. – 2022. – Vol. 24, No. 1. – pp. 11-17. – doi: 10.26442/20795696.2022.1.201356
  7. Clinical recommendations. Postoperative scar on the uterus, requiring the provision of medical care to the mother during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period, 2021
  8. Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;205(3):262.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.035. Epub 2011 Jun 15. PMID: 22071057.
  9. Yaman Tunc S, Agacayak E, Sak S, Basaranoglu S, Goruk NY, Turgut A, Tay H, Elci E, Gul T. Multiple repeat caesarean deliveries: do they increase maternal and neonatal morbidity? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Mar;30(6):739-744. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1183638. Epub 2016 May 20. PMID: 27125601.
  10. Vaginal delivery or cesarean section - a conscious choice of an obstetrician / L. S. Logutova, S. N. Buyanova, A. L. Gridchik [et al.] // Obstetrics and gynecology. - 2020. – No. 7. – pp. 135-142. – doi: 10.18565/aig.2020.7.135-142.
  11. Kok N, Wiersma IC, Opmeer BC, de Graaf IM, Mol BW, Pajkrt E. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;42(2):132-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.12479. PMID: 23576473.
  12. Einerson BD, Comstock J, Silver RM, Branch DW, Woodward PJ, Kennedy A. Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder: Uterine Dehiscence, Not Placental Invasion. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;135(5):1104-1111. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003793. PMID: 32282597
  13. Barinov S.V., Bindyuk A.V., Ralko V.V., Grebenyuk O.A., Ilinykh I.M. On the issue of delivery of pregnant women with a scar on the uterus. Russian bulletin of the obstetrician-gynecologist. 2015;15(4):29‑33
  14. An innovative approach to studying the condition of the scar on the uterus after cesarean section surgery based on a comparative study / A. N. Strizhakov, I. V. Ignatko, A. A. Churganova, A. G. Aslanov // Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. – 2021. – Vol. 76, No. 5. – pp. 429-435. – doi: 10.15690/vramn1291
  15. Debatable issues of uterine scar insolvency in the era of the cesarean section epidemic / D. V. Polyanin, A. A. Mikhelson, O. A. Melkozerova, K. D. Lukyanova // Ural Medical Journal. – 2019. – № 5(173). – Pp. 17-23. – doi: 10.25694/URMJ.2019.05.30.
  16. Yametova N.M., Tskhai V.B., Domracheva M.Ya. Repeated cesarean section surgery in women with two or more uterine scars. Medical Bulletin of the South of Russia. 2021;12(1):X-X. doi: 10.21886/2219-8075-2021-12-3-86-91
  17. THE EXPERIENCE OF SURGICAL CORRECTION OF AN INCOMPETENT SCAR ON THE UTERUS AFTER CESAREAN SECTION AT THE STAGE OF PRE-GRAVIDAR PREPARATION. Malysheva A.A., Matukhin V.I., Reznik V.A., Rukhlyada N.N., Taits A.N. Problems of reproduction. 2018. Vol. 24. No. 6. pp. 46-50.
  18. Laparoscopic metroplasty in case of an incompetent scar on the uterus after cesarean section / H. B. Balashova, L. N. Shcherbakova, O. B. Panina, A. E. Bugerenko // Issues of gynecology, obstetrics and perinatology. - 2022. – Vol. 21, No. 4. – pp. 126-132. – doi: 10.20953/1726-16782022-4-126-132
  19. The true growth of the placenta / O. B. Kalinkina, Yu. V. Tezikov, I. S. Lipatov [et al.] // Practical medicine. - 2020. – vol. 18, No. 2. – pp. 71-73.
  20. Surgical tactics for placenta accretion with different depth of invasion / R. G. Shmakov, M. M. Pirogova, O. N. Vasilchenko [et al.] // Obstetrics and gynecology. - 2020. – No. 1. – pp. 78-82. – doi: 10.18565/aig.2020.1.78-82.
  21. Organ-preserving surgical treatment for placenta previa and its ingrowth into the uterine scar (clinical observation) / A. Y. Ralnikova, V. F. Refugee, B. V. Arakelyan, K. A. Gabelova // Obstetrics and gynecology of St. Petersburg. – 2019. – No. 3-4. – pp. 66-70
  22. SPREADING OF THE SCAR ON THE UTERUS AFTER CESAREAN SECTION. Kurtzer M.A., Breslav I.Yu., Barykina O.P., Scriabin N.V., Nigmatullina E.R. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2022. No. 2. pp. 59-64.
  23. A.G. Yaschuk, K.V. Kudryashova, I.I. Musin. The method of metroplasty during operative delivery in women with two or more cesarean section operations in the anamnesis: patent No.2790787 Ros. Federation; declared: 07/29/2022; published: 02/28/2023. Byul. No. RU 2790787 C1
  24. Baranovskaya E.I. Isthmocele formation after cesarean section. Russian bulletin of the obstetrician-gynecologist. 2023;23(5):32‑37.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) Eco-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ПИ № ФС 77 - 86335 от 11.12.2023 г.  
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80633 от 15.03.2021 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies