The use of a thulium laser to remove endometrial polyps in women of reproductive age.
- Authors: Dobrokhotova Y.E.1, Lapina I.A.2,3, Allakhverdieva A.R.4,5, Kaykova O.V.6
-
Affiliations:
- N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
- Medsi group JSC
- ФГАОУ ВО «Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет имени Н.И. Пирогова» Минздрава России, Москва, Россия
- АО «Группа компаний „Медси“»
- Group of companies MEDSI
- Section: Original study articles
- Submitted: 02.04.2025
- Accepted: 14.04.2025
- Published: 10.08.2025
- URL: https://archivog.com/2313-8726/article/view/677985
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/aog677985
- ID: 677985
Cite item
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction. Endometrial polyps (EP) are a common gynecological pathology affecting 10-24% of women of reproductive age and are often associated with infertility and menstrual cycle disorders. One of the effective methods of polyp removal is bipolar resection; however, this method is associated with significant pain and prolonged recovery. In the search for more effective and less painful approaches, the use of the thulium laser is considered a promising direction, as it has already proven its efficacy in modern urological practice.
Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of thulium laser polypectomy in women of reproductive age.
Materials and Methods. This study included 46 women with endometrial polyps (23 in each group) and compared two methods of polypectomy: the thulium laser and bipolar resection.
Results and Discussion. The study evaluated procedure time, pain levels, menstrual recovery time, recurrence rates, and acceptability. It was found that the thulium laser provided a shorter procedure time (10.04 ± 0.97 min vs. 13.86 ± 1.2 min), lower pain levels, faster menstrual recovery (28.6 ± 2.9 days vs. 34.65 ± 3.06 days), and a lower recurrence rate (8.69% vs. 17.39%). The acceptability of the thulium laser was also higher among patients (99.39% vs. 92.39% at 1 month).
Conclusion. The results indicate the advantages of the thulium laser in the treatment of endometrial polyps and highlight the need for further research to assess long-term effects.
Full Text

About the authors
Yulia E. Dobrokhotova
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: pr.dobrohotova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7830-2290
SPIN-code: 2925-9948
Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine
Russian Federation, MoscowIrina A. Lapina
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Medsi group JSC
Author for correspondence.
Email: doclapina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2875-6307
D. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowAishan R. Allakhverdieva
ФГАОУ ВО «Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет имени Н.И. Пирогова» Минздрава России, Москва, Россия; АО «Группа компаний „Медси“»
Email: allakhverdievaayshan@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8693-5867
Аспирант кафедры акушерства и гинекологии ИХ
Russian FederationOlesya V. Kaykova
Group of companies MEDSI
Email: kajkova.ov@medsigroup.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-3931-5762
Head of Gynecological Department
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- REFERENCES
- Clinical Guidelines “Endometrial Polyps” (approved by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation). Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Moscow, 2023; p. 32. (in Russian)
- Orazov M.R., Khamoshina M.B., Poimanova O.F., Mullina I.A., Artemenko Yu.S. Clinical and anamnestic factors of recurrent endometrial polyps in reproductive age. Clinical Case in General Medicine. 2023; Vol. 4(9): pp. 00–00. (in Russian)
- Safronov O.V., Kazachkova E.A. Frequency and structure of intrauterine pathology requiring surgical treatment. Ural Medical Journal. 2020; Vol. 186(3): pp. 13–20. (in Russian)
- Khusid J.A., Khargi R., Seiden B., Sadiq A.S., Atallah W.M., Gupta M. Thulium fiber laser utilization in urological surgery: A narrative review. Investigative and Clinical Urology. 2021; 62(2): 136–147. doi: 10.4111/icu.20200467.
- Rice P., Somani B.K. A systematic review of thulium fiber laser: applications and advantages of laser technology in the field of urology. Research and Reports in Urology. 2021; 13: 519–527. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S233979.
- Noureldin Y.A., Kallidonis P., Liatsikos E.N. Lasers for stone treatment: how safe are they? Current Opinion in Urology. 2020; 30: 130–134.
Supplementary files
