Structural Features Investigation of a Highly Dispersed NiO–SiO2 Catalyst by X-Ray Analysis of the Atomic Pair Distribution Function

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

In the present work NiO and NiO–SiO2 were investigated by X-ray diffraction and radial atomic pair distribution methods. By X-ray diffraction method, it was determined that the NiO particle sizes have coherent scattering region of more than 100 nm, while the NiO–SiO2 sample has a particle size of about 2–3 nm. At the same time, full-profile Rietveld simulation does not describe the effects observed on diffraction: the asymmetry of peaks, the appearance of an additional shoulder of peak 111 in the area of small angles, so the radial atomic pair distribution method was used to analyze the structure. During the simulation of the experimental atomic pair distribution curve, 3 different models were used: pure NiO, a mixture of NiO and Ni2SiO4, and a modified NiO model with Si embedded in the lattice. The latter model was created based on the assumption of silicon incorporation into the NiO structure, which can be evidenced by X-ray diffraction data. According to the results of radial atomic pair distribution modeling it is the latter model that gives the best description of the observed effects: significantly increased unit cell parameter, compared to the sample without SiO2 addition, as well as decreased metal cation–oxygen distances in the structure, while cation–cation distances are increased.

Sobre autores

M. Mikhnenko

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, SB RAS; Novosibirsk State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: m.mikhnenko@catalysis.ru
Rússia, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

S. Cherepanova

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, SB RAS

Email: m.mikhnenko@catalysis.ru
Rússia, Novosibirsk

A. Shmakov

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, SB RAS

Email: m.mikhnenko@catalysis.ru
Rússia, Novosibirsk

M. Alekseeva

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, SB RAS

Email: m.mikhnenko@catalysis.ru
Rússia, Novosibirsk

R. Kukushkin

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, SB RAS

Email: m.mikhnenko@catalysis.ru
Rússia, Novosibirsk

V. Yakovlev

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, SB RAS

Email: m.mikhnenko@catalysis.ru
Rússia, Novosibirsk

V. Pakharukova

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, SB RAS; Novosibirsk State University

Email: m.mikhnenko@catalysis.ru
Rússia, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

O. Bulavchenko

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, SB RAS; Novosibirsk State University

Email: m.mikhnenko@catalysis.ru
Rússia, Novosibirsk; Novosibirsk

Bibliografia

  1. Meloni E., Martino M., Palma V. // Catalysts. 2020. № 10. Iss. 3. P. 352. https://www.doi.org/10.3390/catal10030352
  2. Pastor-Pérez L., Saché E.L., Jones C., Gu S., Arellano-Garcia H., Reina T.R. // Catalysis Today. 2018. V. 317. P. 108. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2017.11.035
  3. Елецкий П.М., Мироненко О.О., Соснин Г.А. и др. // Катализ в промышленности. 2016. № 16. C. 42. https://www.doi.org/10.18412/1816-0387-2016-4-42-50
  4. Alekseeva M.V., Rekhtina M.A., Lebedev M.Y., Zavarukhin S.G., Kaichev V.V., Venderbosch R.H., Yakovlev V.A. // Chem. Select. 2018. № 18. V. 3. Iss. 18. P. 5153. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/slct.201800639
  5. Prikhod’ko S.A., Popov A.G., Adonin N.Y. // Molecular Catalysis. 2018. V. 461. P. 19. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2018.09.022
  6. Philippov A.A., Chibiryaev A.M., Martyanov O.N. // Catalysis Today. 2020. V. 355. P. 35. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2019.05.033
  7. Yin W., Venderbosch R.H., He S. Bykova M.V., Khromova S.A., Yakovlev V.A., Heeres H.J. // Biomass Conversion Biorefinery. 2017. V. 7. P. 361. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s13399-017-0267-5
  8. Bykova M.V., Ermakov D.Y., Kaichev V.V., Bulavchenko O.A., Saraev A.A., Lebedev M.Yu., Yakovlev V.А. // Appl. Catalysis B: Environmental. 2012. V. 113–114. P. 296. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.11.051
  9. Chen N., Gong S., Qian E.W. // Appl. Catalysis B: Environmental. 2015. V. 174–175. P. 253. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.03.011
  10. Zhang H., Lin H., Zheng Y. // Appl. Catalysis B: Environmental. 2014. V. 160–161. P. 415. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.05.043
  11. Nepomnyashchiy A.A., Buluchevskiy E.A., Lavrenov A.V., Yurpalov V.L., Gulyaeva T.I., Leont’eva N.N., Talzi V.P. // Rus. J. Appl. Chem. 2017. V. 90. P. 1944. https://www.doi.org/10.1134/S1070427217120084
  12. Santillan-Jimenez E., Morgan T., Loe R., Crocker M. // Catalysis Today. 2015. V. 258. P. 284. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2014.12.004
  13. Jin W., Pastor-Pérez L., Shen D. et al. // Chem. Cat. Chem. 2019. V. 11. №. 3. P. 924. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201801722
  14. Кукушкин Р.Г., Елецкий П.М., Булавченко О.А., Сараев А.А., Яковлев В.А. // Катализ в промышленности. 2019. №. 1. С. 40. https://www.doi.org/10.18412/1816-0387-2019-1-40-49
  15. Smirnov A.A., Shilov I.N., Bulavchenko O.A., Saraev A.A., Yakovlev V.A. // Chem. Select. 2019. V. 4. № 24. P. 7317. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/slct.201901087
  16. Thalinger R., Gocyla M., Heggen M., Dunin-Borkows-ki R., Grünbacher M., Stöger-Pollach M., Schmidmair D., Klötzer B., Penner S. // J. Catalysis. 2016. V. 337. P. 26. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2016.01.020
  17. Aghayan M., Potemkin D.I., Rubio-Marcos F., Uskov S.I., Snytnikov P.V., Hussainova I. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017. V. 9. № 50. P. 43553. https://www.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b08129
  18. Pakharukova V.P., Potemkin D.I., Stonkus O.A., Kharchenko N.A., Saraev A.A., Gorlova A.M. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2021. V. 125. № 37. P. 20538. https://www.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c05529
  19. Ermakova M.A., Ermakov D.Y., Kuvshinov G.G., Plyasova L.M. // J. Catalysis. 1999. V. 187. № 1. P. 77. https://www.doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1999.2562
  20. Bykova M.V., Bulavchenko O.A., Ermakov D.Y., Lebedev M.Yu, Yakovlev V.A., Parmon V.N. // Catalysis Industry. 2011. V. 3. P. 15. https://www.doi.org/10.1134/S2070050411010028
  21. Takeshi E., Billinge S.J.L. // Pergamon Mater. Series. 2012. V. 16. P. 55. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097133-9.00003-4
  22. TOPAS V4: General profile and structure analysis software for powder diffraction data // User’s Manual. Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2008.
  23. Piminov P.A., Baranov G.N., Bogomyagkov A.V. et al. // Phys. Procedia. 2016. V. 84. P. 19. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2016.11.005
  24. Qiu X., Thompson J.W., Billinge S.J.L. // J. Appl. Cryst. 2004. V. 37. № 4. P. 678. https://www.doi.org/10.1107/S0021889804011744
  25. Farrow C.L., Juhas P., Liu J.W., Bryndin D., Božin E.S., Bloch J., Proffen Th., Billinge S.J.L. // J. Phys.: Cond. Matter. 2007. V. 19. № 33. P. 335219. https://www.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/19/33/335219
  26. Pakharukova V.P., Moroz É.M., Zyuzin D.A. // J. Struct. Chem. 2010. V. 51. P. 274. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10947-010-0042-y
  27. Moroz E.M. // Rus. Chem. Rev. 2011. V. 80. P. 293. https://www.doi.org/10.1070/RC2011v080n04ABE H004163
  28. Gates-Rector S., Blanton T. // Powder Diffr. 2019. V. 34. Iss. 4. P. 352. https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S0885715619000812
  29. Zagorac D., Müller H., Ruehl S., Zagorac J., Rehme S. // J. Appl. Cryst. 2019. V. 52. P. 918. https://www.doi.org/10.1107/S160057671900997X

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024