Influence of primary soil cultivation methods and systems on the dynamics of humus in drained soil

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The research was carried out on the experimental fields of the All-Russian Research Institute of Reclaimed Lands (Tver Region). The purpose of the research is to study the influence of soil cultivation techniques and systems on the dynamics of humus in drained soil. The soils of the experimental plots are cultivated sod-podzolic, light loamy, gleyic, formed on a moraine or thin binomial. In 5 experiments in crop rotations, methods of minimizing and deepening the arable layer were studied (plowing and moldless loosening at 28–32 cm, three-tier plowing at 40–45 cm), agro-reclamation methods (reclamation loosening at 50–60 cm, volumetric slitting at a depth of 45–50 cm, ridge plowing at 20–22 cm), agro-reclamation and mixed-depth soil cultivation systems. It has been established that soil cultivation techniques and systems are an important factor influencing the speed and direction of changes in humus content in the soil. Their influence was determined, first of all, by the method, depth and frequency of tillage in crop rotation. Positive results on the dynamics of humus were obtained with ridge, combined and minimal tillage systems with volumetric slicing of the soil. Compared with traditional ridge tillage technology, the humus content in the arable layer increased by 0.23% over 7 years, with combined tillage – by 0.37 and minimum – by 0.46%. In soils on carbonated moraine, positive changes in the dynamics of humus were observed when plowing with a plow with cut-out bodies and during reclamation loosening of the soil. In conditions of complex soil cover, on soils formed on thin soil and moraine, the use of reclamation loosening caused additional difficulties in the formation of a deficit-free balance of organic matter. Reclamation loosening of such soils should be accompanied by liming and an increase in the application rates of organic fertilizers per hectare of crop rotation area, compared to the recommended ones.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

Yu. Mitrofanov

FRC V.V. Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: 2016vniimz-noo@list.ru

PhD in Agricultural Sciences

Ресей, Moscow

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Baybekov R.F., Kirpichnikov N.A., Bizhan S.P., Belek A.N. Vliyaniye dlitel'nogo primeneniya udobreniy na pokazateli plodorodiya dernovopodzolistoy pochvy v zernotravyanom sevooborote // Zemledeliye. 2021. № 7. S. 12–15. https://doi.org/10.24412/0044-3913-2021-7-12-15
  2. Borin A.A., Loshchinina A.E. Produktivnost' sevooborota i plodorodiye pochvy pri razlichnykh tekhnologiyakh yeyo obrabotki // Plodorodiye. 2015. № 2 (83). S. 25–27.
  3. Dubovik D.V., Chuyan O.G. Kachestvo sel'skokhozyaystvennykh kul'tur v zavisimosti ot agrotekhnicheskikh priyemov i klimaticheskikh usloviy // Zemledeliye. 2018. № 2. S. 9–13. https://doi.org/10.24411/0044-3913-2018-10202
  4. Kiryushin V.I. Sostoyaniye i problemy razvitiya adaptivno-landshaftnogo zemledeliya // Zemledeliye. 2021. № 2. S. 3–7. https://doi.org/10.244/0044-3913-2021-10201
  5. Kiryushin V.I. Sistema nauchno-innovatsionnogo obespecheniya tekhnologiy adaptivno-landshaftnogo zemledeliya // Zemledeliye. 2022. № 2. S. 3–7. https://doi.org/10.24412/0044-3913-2022-2-3-7
  6. Mitrofanov Yu.I. Grebnistaya obrabotka pochvy pod zernofurazhnyye kul’tury // Melioratsiya i vodnoye khozyaystvo // 2011. № 4. S. 14–17.
  7. Mitrofanov Yu.I. Agrofizicheskiye osnovy povysheniya produktivnosti osushayemykh pochv: Monografiya. Izd-vo: LAP (Lambert Academic Publishing), Gmbh & Co. KG, Heinish-BocKing – Str. Saarbrucken, Deutschland. 2017. 196 s.
  8. Mitrofanov Yu.I., Gulyayev M.V., Pugacheva L.V., Pervushina N.K. Novyy sposob shchelevaniya osushayemykh pochv // Mezhdunarodnyy sel’skokhozyaystvennyy zhurnal. 2022. 5 (389). C. 541–545. https://doi.org/10.55186/25876740_2022_65_5_541
  9. Nemchenko V.V., Volynkina O.V., Deryabin V.P. Sistemy obrabotki pochvy i yeye plodorodiye // Agrokhimicheskiy vestnik. 2022. № 3. S. 86–96. https://doi.org/ 10.24412/1029-2551-2022-3-016
  10. Novoselov S.I., Kuz’minykh A.N., Yeremeyev R.V. Plodorodiye pochvy i produktivnost’ sel’skokhozyaystvennykh kul’tur v zavisimosti ot osnovnoy obrabotki i sevooborota // Plodorodiye. 2019. № 6 (111). S. 22–25. https://doi.org/10.25680/S19948603.2019.111.06
  11. Perfil’yev N.V., V’yushina O.A. Elementy plodorodiya i produktivnost’ pashni v zavisimosti ot obrabotki pochvy // Sibirskiy vestnik sel’skokhozyaystvennoy nauki. 2020. T. 50. № 1. S. 5–12. https://doi.org/ 10.26898/0370-8799-2020-1-1
  12. Purgin D.V., Usenko V.I., Kravchenko V.I. i dr. Formirovaniye zasorennosti posevov v zernoparovom sevooborote v zavisimosti ot sposoba obrabotki pochvy i primeneniya sredstv khimizatsii. Zemledeliye. 2019. № 8. S. 8–13. https://doi.org/ 10.24411/0044-3913-2019-10802
  13. Tyutyunov S.I., Solntsev P.I., Khoroshilova Yu.V. i dr. Vliyaniye priyemov osnovnoy obrabotki pochvy, udobreniy i sredstv zashchity rasteniy na produktivnost’ ozimoy pshenitsy // Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK. 2020. T. 34. № 5. S. 18–23. https://doi.org/10.24411/0235-2451-2020-10503
  14. Tsygutkin A.S., Azarov A.V. Izucheniye vliyaniya tekhnologiy vozdelyvaniya sel’skokhozyaystvennykh kul’tur i pochvy, kak samorazvivayushcheysya sistemy, na soderzhaniye gumusa // Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK. 2021. T. 35. № 6. S. 44–49. https://doi.org/10.24411/0235-2451-2021-10608
  15. Shevchenko V.A., Solov’yev A.M., Buber A.L. Vliyaniye priyemov obrabotki pochvy na agrofizicheskiye pokazateli plodorodiya pri vozdelyvanii yachmenya na meliorirovannykh zemlyakh Verkhnevolzh’ya // Plodorodiye. 2018. № 4 (103). S. 40–43.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Humus dynamics (%) in field crop rotation under different tillage systems, arable layer: 1 - traditional (20...22 cm) - control, 3 - multi-depth (1, 7 - 20...22 cm; 2, 3, 4, 8 - 10...12 cm), 4 - deep plow with VC, 6 - deep, 28...30 cm, 10 - traditional with three-tier plowing under the first crop of crop rotation.

Жүктеу (106KB)
3. Fig. 2. Effect of crop rotation and main tillage systems on humus mass in soil, layer 0...40 cm.

Жүктеу (123KB)
4. Fig. 3. Humus dynamics in field crop rotation with ameliorative soil loosening.

Жүктеу (147KB)
5. Fig. 4. Effect of different tillage systems on humus content in drained soil.

Жүктеу (247KB)

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024

Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қолжетімді Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.