Postagrogenic Transformation and Assessment of Carbon Stocks of Karelia Unused Forage Lands' Phytocenosis

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

On forage lands overgrown with vegetation of low value for agricultural production, the postagrogenic transformation of the grass cover manifested itself in a decrease in the total projective coverage up to 1.7 times (compared with hayfields 94.8–99.0%) and heterogeneity of the species composition. The coefficients of floral similarity of haymaking Jacquard and forage lands with the curtin type of overgrowth averaged 0.45, and with the solid type – 0.39. Grass-cereal or cereal-grass stands were mainly composed of rhizomatous and turf-bearing plant species. The reserves of absolutely dry aboveground mass (4.86 t/ha) and carbon (2.04 t C/ha) of hayfields significantly exceeded (up to 1.5 times) the corresponding indicators of unused forage lands.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

O. Bakhmet

Karelian Scientific Center of the RAS

Email: levstratova@yandex.ru

Corresponding Member of the RAS

Ресей, Petrozavodsk

L. Evstratova

Karelian Scientific Center of the RAS

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: levstratova@yandex.ru

Grand PhD in Agricultural Sciences, Professor

Ресей, Petrozavodsk

E. Nikolaeva

Karelian Scientific Center of the RAS

Email: levstratova@yandex.ru

PhD in Agricultural Sciences

Ресей, Petrozavodsk

E. Dubina-Chekhovich

Karelian Scientific Center of the RAS

Email: levstratova@yandex.ru

PhD in Biological Sciences

Ресей, Petrozavodsk

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Bakhmet O.N., Evstratova L.P., Nikolaeva E.V. i dr. Ocenka rastitel’nogo pokrova pri analize byudzheta ugleroda v agrolandshaftah Karelii // Vestnik rossijskoj sel’skohozyajstvennoj nauki. 2023. № 6. S. 55–60.
  2. Vakhrusheva V.V., Pryadil’shchikova E.N., Stolyarchuk E.I. Produktivnost’ i pitatel’naya cennost’ pastbishchnyh agrofitocenozov na osnove zlakovyh i bobovyh trav // Molochnohozyajstvennyj vestnik. 2021. № 2 (42). S. 31–40.
  3. Dospekhov B.A. Metodika polevogo opyta. M.: Agropromizdat, 1985. 351 s.
  4. Mishina Z.A., Surova T.S. K voprosu o prichinah snizheniya plodorodiya pochvy zemel’ sel’skohozyajstvennogo naznacheniya // Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij: ekonomika i upravlenie. 2020. T. 9. № 3 (32). S. 349–353.
  5. Megarran E. Ekologicheskoe raznoobrazie i ego izmerenie. M.: Mir, 1992. 184 s.
  6. Pristova T.A. Soderzhanie ugleroda v rasteniyah srednetaezhnyh listvennyh fitocenozov Respubliki Komi // Principy ekologii. 2022. № 3. S. 43–49. https://doi.org/ 10.15393/j1.art.2022.12402.
  7. Telesnina V.M. Dinamika svojstv pochv vo vzaimosvyazi s rastitel’nost’yu pri estestvennom postagrogennom zarastanii senokosov (Kostromskaya oblast’) // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 17. Pochvovedenie. 2021. № 2. S. 18–28.
  8. Ufimceva M.D. Indikatornaya rol’ rastitel’nosti pri ekologicheskih issledovaniyah [Elektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.eco.nw.ru/lib/data/10/07/020710.htm (Data obrashcheniya 25.09.2024).
  9. Kalinina O., Goryachkin S.V., Lyuri D.I., Giani L. Postagrogenic development of vegetation, soils and carbon stocks under self-restoration in different climatic zones of European Russia // Catena. 2015. V. 129. P. 18–29.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024

Creative Commons License
Бұл мақала лицензия бойынша қолжетімді Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.