Postagrogenic Transformation and Assessment of Carbon Stocks of Karelia Unused Forage Lands' Phytocenosis

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

On forage lands overgrown with vegetation of low value for agricultural production, the postagrogenic transformation of the grass cover manifested itself in a decrease in the total projective coverage up to 1.7 times (compared with hayfields 94.8–99.0%) and heterogeneity of the species composition. The coefficients of floral similarity of haymaking Jacquard and forage lands with the curtin type of overgrowth averaged 0.45, and with the solid type – 0.39. Grass-cereal or cereal-grass stands were mainly composed of rhizomatous and turf-bearing plant species. The reserves of absolutely dry aboveground mass (4.86 t/ha) and carbon (2.04 t C/ha) of hayfields significantly exceeded (up to 1.5 times) the corresponding indicators of unused forage lands.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

O. N. Bakhmet

Karelian Scientific Center of the RAS

Email: levstratova@yandex.ru

Corresponding Member of the RAS

Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk

L. P. Evstratova

Karelian Scientific Center of the RAS

Author for correspondence.
Email: levstratova@yandex.ru

Grand PhD in Agricultural Sciences, Professor

Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk

E. V. Nikolaeva

Karelian Scientific Center of the RAS

Email: levstratova@yandex.ru

PhD in Agricultural Sciences

Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk

E. V. Dubina-Chekhovich

Karelian Scientific Center of the RAS

Email: levstratova@yandex.ru

PhD in Biological Sciences

Russian Federation, Petrozavodsk

References

  1. Bakhmet O.N., Evstratova L.P., Nikolaeva E.V. i dr. Ocenka rastitel’nogo pokrova pri analize byudzheta ugleroda v agrolandshaftah Karelii // Vestnik rossijskoj sel’skohozyajstvennoj nauki. 2023. № 6. S. 55–60.
  2. Vakhrusheva V.V., Pryadil’shchikova E.N., Stolyarchuk E.I. Produktivnost’ i pitatel’naya cennost’ pastbishchnyh agrofitocenozov na osnove zlakovyh i bobovyh trav // Molochnohozyajstvennyj vestnik. 2021. № 2 (42). S. 31–40.
  3. Dospekhov B.A. Metodika polevogo opyta. M.: Agropromizdat, 1985. 351 s.
  4. Mishina Z.A., Surova T.S. K voprosu o prichinah snizheniya plodorodiya pochvy zemel’ sel’skohozyajstvennogo naznacheniya // Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij: ekonomika i upravlenie. 2020. T. 9. № 3 (32). S. 349–353.
  5. Megarran E. Ekologicheskoe raznoobrazie i ego izmerenie. M.: Mir, 1992. 184 s.
  6. Pristova T.A. Soderzhanie ugleroda v rasteniyah srednetaezhnyh listvennyh fitocenozov Respubliki Komi // Principy ekologii. 2022. № 3. S. 43–49. https://doi.org/ 10.15393/j1.art.2022.12402.
  7. Telesnina V.M. Dinamika svojstv pochv vo vzaimosvyazi s rastitel’nost’yu pri estestvennom postagrogennom zarastanii senokosov (Kostromskaya oblast’) // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 17. Pochvovedenie. 2021. № 2. S. 18–28.
  8. Ufimceva M.D. Indikatornaya rol’ rastitel’nosti pri ekologicheskih issledovaniyah [Elektronnyj resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.eco.nw.ru/lib/data/10/07/020710.htm (Data obrashcheniya 25.09.2024).
  9. Kalinina O., Goryachkin S.V., Lyuri D.I., Giani L. Postagrogenic development of vegetation, soils and carbon stocks under self-restoration in different climatic zones of European Russia // Catena. 2015. V. 129. P. 18–29.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.