Modern approaches in combined surgical treatment of complex forms of genital prolapse

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the existence of a considerable number of techniques for surgical correction of genital prolapse, patients and doctors cannot be always sure regarding the efficacy of surgical treatment in achieving satisfactory results. As was the case many years ago, the issues of improving the efficacy, reliability and safety of surgical treatment of genital prolapse, as well as the intent to generate individual treatment approach, taking into account the type of prolapse and medical condition of women, remain pertinent.

AIM: The objective of this study is to develop surgical techniques for patients with complex types of pelvic organ prolapse, including women with unfavourable general medical condition.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comprehensive clinical examination and surgical treatment of 20 patients with II–IV stage pelvic organ prolapse according to the POP-Q classification, who exhibited similar nosological forms of prolapse but disparate comorbidity status, was conducted. Group 1 included 11 patients with complex pelvic organ prolapse who underwent combined laparoscopic pectopexy. Due to the presence of decubitus changes of the cervix and adverse general status, a two-staged strategy was chosen for nine patients of the Group 2, i.e. laparoscopic correction of apical prolapse — uterine suspension with the use of titanium tapes — at the first stage, and modified Manchester (Moscow) operation with the use of titanium tape, colpoperineorrhaphy with levator ani muscles plication — at the second stage.

RESULTS: The results of the questionnaire indicated that all patients reported a notable improvement in their quality of life and social integration. In all patients, the symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse significantly improved, and no signs of disease recurrence were present.

CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that the proposed surgical techniques for treating pelvic organ prolapse are a viable, efficacious and secure option. They offer swift recuperation and reliable rehabilitation. These techniques have the potential to improve both the physical and social well-being of patients. The described surgical techniques help to restore the normal anatomical position and functions of the organs.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Dmitry V. Bryunin

First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov

Email: bryun777@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5969-4217
SPIN-code: 1439-3731

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anatoly I. Ishchenko

First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov

Email: 7205502@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3338-1113
SPIN-code: 3294-3251

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Alina N. Pyatkina

First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov

Author for correspondence.
Email: patkinaalina@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4260-9661

Graduate Student

Russian Federation, Moscow

Yury V. Chushkov

First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov

Email: obstetrics-gynecology@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8125-1829
SPIN-code: 6066-9273

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Abhyankar P, Uny I, Semple K, et al. Women’s experiences of receiving care for pelvic organ prolapse: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0741-2
  2. Oraekwe OI, Udensi MA, Nwachukwu KC, Okali UK. Genital prolapse: A 5-year review at Federal Medical Centre Umuahia, Southeastern Nigeria. Niger Med J. 2016;57(5):286–289. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.190601
  3. Reynolds WS, Gold KP, Ni S, et al. Immediate effects of the initial FDA notification on the use of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse surgery in medicare beneficiaries. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32(4):330–335. doi: 10.1002/nau.22318
  4. Hauck YL, Lewis L, Nathan EA, et al. Risk factors for severe perineal trauma during vaginal childbirth: a Western Australian retrospective cohort study. Women Birth. 2015;28(1):16–20. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2014.10.007
  5. Apolikhina IA, Dodova YeG, Borodina YeA, et al. Pelvic floor dysfunction: modern principles of diagnostics and treatment. Effective Pharmacotherapy. 2016;(22):16–22. EDN: WHOVTV
  6. Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy: Greentop Guideline No. 21 // BJOG. 2016;123(13):e15–e55. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14189
  7. de Tayrac R, Sentilhes L. Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1859–1872. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2177-9
  8. Bradley CS, Zimmerman MB, Qi Y, Nygaard IE. Natural history of pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):848–854. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000255977.91296.5d
  9. Gaivoronsky IV, Niauri DA, Bessonov NYu, et al. Morphological features of the small pelvis structure, as prerequisites for developing genital prolapse. Kursk Scientific and Practical Bulletin Man and His Health. 2018;(2):86–93. doi: 10.21626/vestnik/2018-2/14
  10. Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, Milsom I. Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG. 2013;120(2):152–160. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12020
  11. Parshikov VV, Mironov AA, Anikina EA, et al. Prosthetic repair of the abdominal wall using light and ultra-light synthetic and titan-containing materials in high bacterial contamination (experimental study). Modern Technologies in Medicine. 2015;7(4):64–71. EDN: VEEDGV doi: 10.17691/stm2015.7.4.08
  12. Mattsson NK, Karjalainen PK, Tolppanen A-M, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and quality of life — a nationwide cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(6):588.e1–588.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1285
  13. MacCraith E, Cunnane EM, Joyce M, et al. Comparison of synthetic mesh erosion and chronic pain rates after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(3):573–580. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04612-x
  14. Kim TY, Jeon MJ. Risk factors for vaginal mesh erosion after sacrocolpopexy in Korean women. PLoS One. 2020;15(2): e0228566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228566
  15. Korshunov MYu. Prolapse of pelvic organs in women: a personalized approach to diagnosis, surgical correction and evaluation of treatment outcomes [dissertation abstract]. Saint Petersburg; 2017. 22 p. EDN: ZQFEYF
  16. Sung VW, Rardin CR, Raker CA, et al. Porcine subintestinal submucosal graft augmentation for rectocele repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(1):125–133. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823d407e
  17. Shek KL, Dietz HP. Pelvic floor ultrasonography: an update. Minerva Ginecol. 2013;65(1):1–20.
  18. Savelyeva GM, Sukhikh GT, Serov VN, Manukhin IB, Radzinsky VE, editors. Gynecology: national guide. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2017. (In Russ.)
  19. Dietz HP. Pelvic floor ultrasound in prolapse: what’s in it for the surgeon? Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(10):1221–1232. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1459-3
  20. Fleischer AC, Harvey SM, Kurita SC, et al. Two-/three-dimensional transperineal sonography of complicated tape and mesh implants. Ultrasound Q. 2012;28(4):243–249. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e3182749585

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ПИ № ФС 77 - 86335 от 11.12.2023 г.  
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80633 от 15.03.2021 г.