International aspects of anti-vaccination attitude: implications for public health (literature review)

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

Successful immunization programmes are the result of high vaccine effectiveness and timely use. Numerous studies have shown that immunization will be effective with government support, taking into account the local culture of the population, and approaches to vaccination to optimize results. 

Purpose. Summarize the world’s data on existing immunization programs and their accompanying problems. Literature search methods included search queries, in the form of a set of keywords «vaccination/vaccine», «immunization», «anti-vaxxers», «pandemic», «public health» followed by full-text sources, Web of Science, Scopus, MedLine, The Cochrane Library. In the information retrieval systems, the analysis of the results was carried out, taking into account full compliance with the specified criteria of search among documents and sites. 

Unlike most medicines, which have limited benefits, vaccines prevent serious diseases and their public health consequences. Immunization outcome is determined by assessing the impact directly on the vaccinated person, indirectly on the unvaccinated community. The success of immunization depends on a level of universal coverage sufficient to interrupt pathogen transmission. Declines in immunization coverage will lead to a resurgence of diseases and new outbreaks with significant gain in the morbidity and mortality rate. In many cases, refusal to vaccinate is the result of people listening to beliefs and copying the behavior of others. An important consequence of this misperception is the potential involvement in the spread of an infectious pathogen due to the false belief that “vaccination is harmful”. 

Thus, ensuring the success of the continuity of immunization programs is the responsibility of citizens, health professionals and government, among others.

Contribution of the authors:
 Pivovarova O.A. — research concept and design, collection and processing of material, writing the text, compilation of the list of literature;
Kuraeva V.M. — editing.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Acknowledgment. The study had no sponsorship.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Received: July 18, 2022
Accepted: September 07, 2022
Published: December 12, 2022

 

作者简介

Oksana Pivovarova

Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: pivovarovaoa1@zdrav.mos.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4234-1869

Аcademic secretary of the Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, 115088, Russian Federation.

e-mail: pivovarovaOA1@zdrav.mos.ru

俄罗斯联邦

Viktoriya Kuraeva

Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management of Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1437-5861
俄罗斯联邦

参考

  1. Lin C., Mullen J., Smith D., Kotarba M., Kaplan S.J., Tu P. Healthcare providers’ vaccine perceptions, hesitancy, and recommendation to patients: a systematic review. Vaccines. 2021; 9(7): 713. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9070713
  2. Zhang M.X., Lin X.Q., Chen Y., Tung T.H., Zhu J.S. Determinants of parental hesitancy to vaccinate their children against COVID-19 in China. Exp. Rev. Vaccines. 2021; 20(10): 1339-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2021.1967147
  3. WHO. Ten threats to global health in 2019. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019
  4. Szilagyi P.G., Albertin C.S., Gurfinkel D., Saville A.W., Vangala S., Rice J.D., et al. Prevalence and characteristics of HPV vaccine hesitancy among parents of adolescents across the US. Vaccine. 2020; 38(38): 6027-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.074
  5. Kreidl P., Breitwieser M.M., Würzner R., Borena W. 14-year-old schoolchildren can consent to get vaccinated in Tyrol, Austria: What do they know about diseases and vaccinations? Vaccines (Basel). 2020; 8(4): 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040610
  6. Lin C., Tu P., Beitsch L.M. Confidence and receptivity for COVID-19 vaccines: A rapid systematic review. Vaccines (Basel). 2020; 9(1): 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9010016
  7. Fisher K.A., Bloomstone S.J., Walder J., Crawford S., Fouayzi H., Mazor K.M. Attitudes toward a potential SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: A survey of U.S. adults. Ann.Intern. Med. 2020; 173(12): 964-73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M20-3569
  8. Jennings W., Stoker G., Bunting H., Valgarðsson V.O., Gaskell J., Devine D., et al. Lack of trust, conspiracy beliefs, and social media use predict COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Vaccines (Basel). 2021; 9(6): 593. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9060593
  9. Independent. Hall R. Anti-vaccination movement could derail fight against coronavirus, experts warn. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/coronavirus-vaccine-anti-vaxxer-donald-trump-a9426151.html
  10. Evans Early American. Massey E. A sermon against the dangerous and sinful practice of inoculation. William Meadows. 1722. Available at: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/evans/N02782.0001.001?rgn=main;view=fulltext
  11. Vox. North A. The long, strange history of anti-vaccination movements. Available at: https://www.vox.com/the-goods/22958419/covid-vaccine-mandate-pandemic-history
  12. Wolfe R.M., Sharp L.K. Anti-vaccinationists past and present. BMJ. 2002; 325(7361): 430-2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7361.430
  13. Lowy I. Les politiques de vaccination au Bresil: entre science, sante publique et controle social. Sci. Soc. Sante. 2009; 27(3): 105-34. https://doi.org/10.3917/sss.273.0105
  14. Conis E. Vaccine Nation: America’s Changing Relationship with Immunization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2014.
  15. Jamison A.M., Quinn S.C., Freimuth V.S. “You don’t trust a government vaccine”: Narratives of institutional trust and influenza vaccination among African American and white adults. Soc. Sci. Med. 2019; 221: 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.020
  16. Brimnes N. Fallacy, sacrilege, betrayal and conspiracy: the cultural construction of opposition to immunisation in India. See Ref. 2017; 60: 51-76. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526110916.00009
  17. Greenough P.Intimidation, coercion and resistance in the final stages of the South Asian Smallpox Eradication Campaign, 1973-1975. Soc. Sci. Med. 1995; 41(5): 633-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00035-6
  18. Kulenkampff M., Schwartzman J.S., Wilson J. Neurological complications of pertussis inoculation. Arch. Dis. Child. 1974; 49(1): 46-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.49.1.46
  19. Begg N., White J., Bozoky Z. Media dents confidence in MMR vaccine. BMJ. 1998; 316(7130): 561. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.316.7130.561
  20. Gangarosa E.J., Galazka A.M., Wolfe C.R., Phillips L.M., Gangarosa R.E., Miller E., et al. Impact of anti-vaccine movements on pertussis control: the untold story. Lancet. 1998; 351(9099): 356-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(97)04334-1
  21. Stratton K.R., Howe C.J., Johnston R.J., eds. Adverse Events Associated with Childhood Vaccines: Evidence Bearing on Causality. Washington: National Academies Press (US); 1994.
  22. Wakefield A.J., Murch S.H., Anthony A., Linnell J., Casson D.M., Malik M., et al. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet. 1998; 351(9103): 637-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11096-0
  23. Hussain A., Ali S., Ahmed M., Hussain S. The anti-vaccination movement: A regression in modern medicine. Cureus. 2018; 10(7): e2919. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.2919
  24. Swingle C.A. How do we approach anti-vaccination attitudes? Mo Med. 2018; 115(3): 180-1.
  25. Mitra T., Counts S., Pennebaker J. Understanding anti-vaccination attitudes in social media. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 2021; 10(1): 269-78.
  26. ScienceNordic. Monsted B. A 60 billion tweet study of anti-vaccine misinformation. Available at: https://sciencenordic.com/denmark-forskerzonen-researchers-zone/a-60-billion-tweet-study-of-anti-vaccine-misinformation/1984480
  27. WHO. Vaccines and immunization: Myths and misconceptions. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/vaccines-and-immunization-myths-and-misconceptions
  28. United Nation. Misinformation and growing distrust on vaccines, ‘dangerous as a disease’ says UNICEF chief. Available at: https://news.un.org/en/story/2019/06/1041571e
  29. Weigmann K. An injection of confidence: scientists explore new and old methods to counter anti-vaccine propaganda and overcome vaccine hesitancy so as to increase vaccination rates. EMBO Rep. 2017; 18(1): 21-4. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201643589
  30. Benoit S.L., Mauldin R.F. The “anti-vax” movement: a quantitative report on vaccine beliefs and knowledge across social media. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1): 2106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12114-8
  31. Corcoran B., Clarke A., Barrett T. Rapid response to HPV vaccination crisis in Ireland. Lancet. 2018; 391(10135): 2103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30854-7
  32. Suppli C.H., Hansen N.D., Rasmussen M., Valentiner-Branth P., Krause T.G., Mоlbak K. Decline in HPV-vaccination uptake in Denmark - the association between HPV-related media coverage and HPV-vaccination. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1): 1360. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6268-x
  33. Center for Countering Digital Hate. The anti-vaxx industry: how big tech powers and profits from vaccine misinformation. Available at: https://www.counterhate.com/anti-vaxx-industry
  34. Dunn A.G., Leask J., Zhou X., Mandl K.D., Coiera E. Associations between exposure to and expression of negative opinions about human papillomavirus vaccines on social media: an observational study. J. Med.Internet Res. 2015; 17(6): e144. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4343
  35. Yaqub O., Castle-Clarke S., Sevdalis N., Chataway J. Attitudes to vaccination: a critical review. Soc. Sci. Med. 2014; 112: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.018
  36. TRAC: COVID - Trust and Communication: A Coronavirus Online Visual Dashboard. Available at: https://traccovid.com/traccovid/
  37. Hoffman B.L., Felter E.M., Chu K.H., Shensa A., Hermann С., Wolynn T., et al. It’s not all about autism: The emerging landscape of anti-vaccination sentiment on Facebook. Vaccine. 2019; 37(16): 2216-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.003
  38. Brazilian Society of Tropical Medicine. Anti-vaccine movement is one of the ten threats to global health. Available at: https://www.sbmt.org.br/portal/anti-vaccine-movement-is-one-of-the-ten-threats-to-global-health/?locale=en-US%26lang%3Den&lang=en
  39. Healthy Children. AAP Urges Major Technology Companies to Combat Vaccine Misinformation. Available at: https://www.healthychildren.org/English/news/Pages/AAP-Urges-Major-Technology-Companies-to-Combat-Vaccine-Misinformation.aspx
  40. Buechner M.M. UNICEF’s guide to fighting vaccine misinformation. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/unicefusa/2021/02/04/unicefs-guide-to-fighting-vaccine-misinformation/?sh=1dc953557f67
  41. Vaccine Misinformation Management Field Guide. United Nations Children’s Fund. New York; 2020. Available at: https://vaccinemisinformation.guide/
  42. Williamson K.M., Merritt T., Durrheim D.N. Australia: an island in a sea of measles. Med. J. Aust. 2020; 213(3): 101-3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50650
  43. UNICEF. Immunization coverage estimates data visualization; 2021. Available at: https://data.unicef.org/resources/immunization-coverage-estimates-data-visualization/
  44. WHO. WHO and UNICEF warn of a decline in vaccinations during COVID-19. Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/15-07-2020-who-and-unicef-warn-of-a-decline-in-vaccinations-during-covid-19
  45. WHO Immunization information system. Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals. Available at: https://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/immunization-and-covid-19/en/
  46. WHO. Best practice guidance. How to respond to vocal vaccine deniers in public. Copenhagen; 2017. Available at: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/315761/Vocal-vaccine-deniers-guidance-document.pdf
  47. Schmid P., Betsch C. Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2019; 3(9): 931-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0632-4

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Pivovarova O.A., Kuraeva V.M., 2022

Creative Commons License
此作品已接受知识共享署名 4.0国际许可协议的许可
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ:  ПИ № ФС77-50668 от 13.07.2012 г.