Comparative assessment of cytogenetic disorders, indicators of proliferation and destruction of the nucleus in the cells of the vaginal and buccal epithelium in pregnant women living in environmentally unfavourable territories

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Introduction. Many pollutants of various natures constantly worsen the environmental situation, thereby causing irreparable harm to the health of the population. Technogenic impact on the biosphere has become one of the significant factors dictating our conditions of existence on Earth.

Purpose of the study. To conduct a comparative analysis of the frequency of cytogenetic disorders, proliferation indicators and nuclear destruction in the vaginal and buccal epithelium in 26–33 years pregnant women living in conditions of radiation, chemical, and combined contamination of the Bryansk region.

Materials and methods. State Report “On the State and Environmental Protection of the Russian Federation micronucleus test, Shapiro–Wilk test, Mann–Whitney U test.

Results. The frequency of cytogenetic disorders, indicators of proliferation and destruction of the nucleus in the vaginal epithelium in 28–33 years pregnant women living in areas of radioactive, chemical, and combined environmental pollution is 1.3–4.9 times higher (p<0.01–0.001), and in the buccal epithelium it is 1.6–7.8 times higher (p<0.001) in comparison with environmentally safe (control) areas. The combined influence of radioactive contamination and chemical pollution led to a significantly higher (increase from 12.8% to 81.4% in the vaginal epithelium and from 22.6% to 2.3 times in the buccal epithelium) frequency of cells with micronuclei, protrusions, binucleate cells, cells with a double nucleus, as well as cells with karyopyknosis and karyolysis in pregnant women compared to areas where there is only one pollution factor.

Limitations. We did not analyze socio-economic factors, the health status of newborns, and statistical data on childbirth in the cities and districts of the Bryansk region.

Conclusion. The obtained results indicate, with all likelihood, the synergistic nature of the effects of radiation and chemical factors on the cytogenetic status in pregnant women.

Compliance with ethical standards. At the beginning of the study, informed voluntary consents were obtained from each patient.

Contribution:
Domakhina A.S. – cytomic analysis, analysis of literary data, statistical processing, writing text;
Korsakov A.V. –
concept and design of the study, interpretation of the results, analysis of literary data, writing text, editing;
Troshin V.P.
– cytomic analysis, data analysis and interpretation, writing text, editing;
Milushkina O.Y., Pivovarov Yu.P., Korolik V.V. – interpretation of the results, writing text, editing.
All co-authors – approval of the final version of the article, responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the article.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement. The study had no sponsorship.

Received: April 14, 2024 / Revised: September 10, 2024 / Accepted: December 3, 2024 / Published: March 7, 2025

About the authors

Alexandra S. Domakhina

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: domahinasasha@yandex.ru

Candidate of the Department of Hygiene of the Department of Disaster Medicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

e-mail: domahinasasha@yandex.ru

Anton V. Korsakov

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: noemail@neicon.ru

DSc (Biology), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Disaster Medicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

Vladislav P. Troshin

Bryansk State Technical University

Email: noemail@neicon.ru

DSc (Medicine), Honoured Doctor the Russian Federation, Professor of the Department “Technosphere Safety”, Bryansk State Technical University, Bryansk, 241035, Russian Federation

Olga Yu. Milushkina

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: noemail@neicon.ru

DSc (Medicine), Professor, Corresponding member of RAS, Head of the Department of Hygiene, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

Yuri P. Pivovarov

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: noemail@neicon.ru

DSc (Medicine), Professor, Academician of the RAS, Professor of the Department of Hygiene of the Pediatric Faculty, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

Viktor V. Korolik

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: noemail@neicon.ru

DSc (Medicine), Professor, Professor of the Department of Hygiene, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

References

  1. Orellano P., Reynoso J., Quaranta N., Bardach A., Ciapponi A. Short-term exposure to particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3) and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Int. 2020; 142: 105876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105876
  2. Rakhmanin Y.A., Novikov S.M., Avaliani S.L., Sinitsyna O.O., Shashina T.A. Actual problems of environmental factors risk assessment on human health and ways to improve it. Health Risk Analysis. 2015; (2): 4–11. https://elibrary.ru/cwdqgf
  3. Lourenço J., Mendo S., Pereira R. Radioactively contaminated areas: Bioindicator species and biomarkers of effect in an early warning scheme for a preliminary risk assessment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016; 317: 503–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.020
  4. Revich B.A. The significance of green spaces for protecting health of urban population. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2023; (2): 168–85. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2023.2.17 https://elibrary.ru/rhupeq (in Russian)
  5. Aleksakhin R.M., Buldakov L.A., Gubanov V.A., Drozhko E.G., Il’in L.A., Kryshev I.I., et al. Major Radiation Accidents: Consequences and Protective Measures [Krupnye radiatsionnye avarii: posledstviya i zashchitnye mery]. Moscow; 2001. (in Russian)
  6. Yablokov A.V. Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and Nature [Chernobyl’: posledstviya Katastrofy dlya cheloveka i prirody (shestoe izdanie, dopolnennoe i pererabotannoe)]. Moscow; 2016. https://elibrary.ru/wkdafj (in Russian)
  7. Bréchignac F., Oughton D., Mays C., Barnthouse L., Beasley J.C., Bonisoli-Alquati A., et al. Addressing ecological effects of radiation on populations and ecosystems to improve protection of the environment against radiation: Agreed statements from a Consensus Symposium. J. Environ. Radioact. 2016; 158-159: 21–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.03.021
  8. Izrael’ Yu.A., Bogdevich I.M. Atlas of Modern and Forecast Aspects of the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident in the Affected Areas of Russia and Belarus [Atlas sovremennykh i prognoznykh aspektov posledstvii avarii na Chernobyl’skoi AES na postradavshikh territoriyakh Rossii i Belarusi]. Moscow–Minsk: Infosfera; 2009. (in Russian)
  9. Muratova N.A. Cities and Districts of the Bryansk Region (Statistical Collection) [Goroda i raiony Bryanskoi oblasti (statisticheskii sbornik)]. Bryansk; 2020. (in Russian)
  10. Yakhryushin V.N. Data on radioactive contamination of the territory of settlements of the Russian Federation with Cesium-137, Strontium-90 and Plutonium-239+240. Available at: https://www.rpatyphoon.ru/upload/medialibrary/ezhegodniki/rzrf/ezheg_rzrf_2023.pdf (in Russian)
  11. Romanovich I.K., Bruk G.Ya., Bazyukin A.B., Bratilova A.A., Yakovlev V.A. The dynamics of the average annual and cumulative radiation exposure doses of the adult population of the Russian federation after the Chernobyl disaster. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya – ZNiSO. 2020; (3): 33–8. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2020-324-3-33-38 https://elibrary.ru/iufblc (in Russian)
  12. Korsakov A.V., Domahina A.S., Troshin V.P., Geger E.V. Child and adult morbidity in the Bryansk region by the level of radioactive, chemical and combined contamination: an ecological study. Ekologiya cheloveka. 2020; (7): 4–14. https://doi.org/10.33396/1728-0869-2020-7-4-14 https://elibrary.ru/inbcje (in Russian)
  13. Yablokov A.V. On the concept of “population load” (review). Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2015; 94(6): 11–4. https://elibrary.ru/uxzqrd (in Russian)
  14. Volkova A.T., Tselousova O.S., Zagidullina S.R., Potapova I.A., Victorova T.V. Apoptosis indicators analysis in adaptation to the urban environment. Meditsinskii vestnik Bashkortostana. 2014; 9(6): 77–80. https://elibrary.ru/tgucrf (in Russian)
  15. Kazantseva E.V., Dolgushina N.V., Ilchenko I.N. Effect of anthropogenic chemicals on the course of pregnancy. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2013; (2): 32–7. https://elibrary.ru/pxnsrn (in Russian)
  16. Verzilina I.N., Churnosov M.I., Evdokimov V.I. Study of the impact of atmospheric pollutants on morbidity in pregnancy in the Belgorod region. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2015; 94(4): 11–4. https://elibrary.ru/uhkvxn (in Russian)
  17. Setko N.P., Zakharova Ye.A. Metal kinetics in the mother-fe-tus-neonate system upon technogenic exposure. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2005; 84(6): 65–7. https://elibrary.ru/ojnrsn (in Russian)
  18. Kuzmin D.V. Comparative analysis of reproductive health indices in women living in proximity to an aluminum work area. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2007; 86(3): 13–5. https://elibrary.ru/iahlbh (in Russian)
  19. Antypkin Y.G., Gorban N.Y., Borysiuk O.Y., Lynchak O.V. The reproductive health of the female residents in the areas of Ukraine affected by the radioactive contamination (2007–2017). Probl. Radiac. Med. Radiobiol. 2019; 24: 284–95.
  20. Kundiev Y.I., Chernyuk V.I., Karakashyan A.N., Martynovskaya T.Y. Chornobyl and reproductive health of a female rural population (an epidemiological study). Probl. Radiac. Med. Radiobiol. 2013; (18): 102–18.
  21. Fenech M., Holland N., Zeiger E., Chang W.P., Burgaz S., Thomas P., et al. The HUMN and HUMNxL international collaboration projects on human micronucleus assays in lymphocytes and buccal cells – past, present and future. Mutagenesis. 2011; 26(1): 239–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geq051
  22. Kashyap B., Reddy P.S. Micronuclei assay of exfoliated oral buccal cells: means to assess the nuclear abnormalities in different diseases. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2012; 8(2): 184–91. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.98968
  23. Sycheva L.P. Cytogenetic monitoring for assessment of safety of environmental health. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2012; 91(6): 68–72. https://elibrary.ru/pwktnp (in Russian)
  24. Korsakov A.V., Troshin V.P., Sidorov I.V., Zhilin A.V., Mikhalev V.P. The comparative evaluation of alterations of buccal epithelium in puerperal with inherent malformations of fetus residing in territories with chemical pollution of environment. Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2014; 58(5): 45–9. https://elibrary.ru/smfcrp (in Russian)
  25. Korsakov A.V., Troshin V.P. Features of cytogenetic damage in the buccal epithelium of women with congenital developmental anomalies of the fetus, living in conditions radiation, chemical and combined environmental pollution. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta (seriya XXIII antropologiya). 2016; (1): 93–101. https://elibrary.ru/vytupp (in Russian)
  26. Nersesyan A., Kundi M., Fenech M., Stopper H., da Silva J., Bolognesi C., et al. Recommendations and quality criteria for micronucleus studies with humans. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 2022; 789: 108410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108410
  27. Gandarillas A., Molinuevo R., Sanz-Gómez N. Mammalian endoreplication emerges to reveal a potential developmental timer. Cell Death Differ. 2018; 25(3): 471–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-017-0040-0
  28. Sanz-Gómez N., de Pedro I., Ortigosa B., Santamaría D., Malumbres M., de Cárcer G., et al. Squamous differentiation requires G2/mitosis slippage to avoid apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2020; 27(8): 2451–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-020-0515-2
  29. Methodological recommendations of the MR FMBA of Russia 12.031–2020. Assessment of the health status of the population and personnel of enterprises engaged in the management of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste under the conditions of complex exposure to radiation and chemical factors; 2020. (in Russian)
  30. Trapeznikova L.N. Doses for the Population of the Bryansk Region from Various Sources of Ionizing Radiation for 2017 (Information Guide) [Dozy oblucheniya naseleniya Bryanskoi oblasti ot razlichnykh istochnikov ioniziruyushchego izlucheniya za 2021 god (informatsionnyi spravochnik)]. Bryansk; 2022. https://elibrary.ru/ymaeot (in Russian)
  31. Geras’kin S.A., Kim J.K., Dikarev V.G., Oudalova A.A., Dikareva N.S., Spirin Y.V. Cytogenetic effects of combined radioactive (137Cs) and chemical (Cd, Pb, and 2,4-D herbicide) contamination on spring barley intercalar meristem cells. Mutat. Res. 2005; 586(2): 147–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.06.004
  32. Deruytter D., Baert J.M., Nevejan N., De Schamphelaere K.A.C., Janssen C.R. Mixture toxicity in the marine environment: Model development and evidence for synergism at environmental concentrations. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2017; 36(12): 3471–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3913
  33. Gomez Isaza D.F., Cramp R.L., Franklin C.E. Simultaneous exposure to nitrate and low pH reduces the blood oxygen-carrying capacity and functional performance of a freshwater fish. Conserv. Physiol. 2020; 8(1): coz092. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coz092

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.