Hygienic aspects of working conditions in the modern production of aluminum

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Introduction. The production of primary aluminum is one of the leading and belonging to the category of an increased health hazard for workers in the economy, which requires close attention to working conditions while modernizing production technology.

Material and methods. The research methodology included a comprehensive study of working conditions and assessment of priority occupational risk factors, an in-depth study of the morphology, dispersed and component composition of dust and gas components air-suspended at different technologies of electrolysis of aluminum.

Results. The leading production factors of occupational risk, degrees are fluorine-containing compounds, dust and gas-aerosol mixtures in the form of separate and assembled into agglomerates micro- and nanostructured particles of complex chemical composition (fluorine, carbon, aluminum, sodium, oxygen, silicon, iron, sulfur, chromium, nickel, etc.), unfavorable microclimate, electromagnetic field, noise, vibration, physical loads, which are related to the 3rd (harmful) class of 1 to 3 degree.

Discussion. Modernization of aluminum production with the introduction of technology of pre-baked anodes allows significantly improve working conditions, reduce the admission of harmful chemical substances into the air of the working area, with the exception of hydrofluoride, the concentration of which exceeds extremely permissible levels in 1.5-3.1 times. Noteworthy is the fact of the detection of aerosols of disintegration and condensation, including particles of nanoscale range, impurities of heavy metals in the air. The consequences of the effect of such complex combination mixtures, their combined effects with other factors on the body, can have pronounced negative effects, which is important with adequate exposure analysis and personalized assessment of the health risks of workers engaged in the production of aluminum.

Conclusion. Working conditions at workplaces with the technology of self-baking anodes are characterized by moderate or severe professional risk, with the technology of pre-baked anodes — mild or moderate risk, which makes the urgent problem of further improvement of aluminum production technologies, detailed analysis of personal exposures of harmful substances for a correct assessment of the health risk of workers, is relevant.

Авторлар туралы

Salim Shayakhmetov

East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: salimf53@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8740-3133

MD, Ph.D., DSci., professor, leading researcher of the laboratory of analytical ecotoxicology and biomonitoring of the East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research, Angarsk, 665827, Russian Federation.

e-mail: salimf53@mail.ru

Ресей

N. Meshchakova

East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9772-0199
Ресей

L. Lisetskaya

East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0876-2304
Ресей

A. Merinov

East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7848-6432
Ресей

O. Zhurba

East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9961-6408
Ресей

A. Alekseyenko

East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4980-5304
Ресей

V. Rukavishnikov

East-Siberian Institute of Medical and Ecological Research

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2536-1550
Ресей

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Tchebotaryov A.G., Prokhorov V.A. Work conditions and occupational morbidity in workers of aluminium production enterprises. Meditsina Truda i Promyshlennaya Ekologiya. 2009; 2: 5–9. (in Russian)
  2. Roslyi O.F., Likhacheva Ye.L., eds. Medicine of labor for electrolytic aluminum production. [Meditsina truda pri elektroliticheskom poluchenii alyuminiya]. Ekaterinburg: Ekaterinburgskiy meditsinskiy nauchnyy tsentr profilaktiki i okhrany zdorov’ya rabochikh prompredpriyatiy; 2011. (in Russian)
  3. Kalinina O.L., Lakhman O.L., Zobnin Yu.V. Evaluation of the working conditions of the main occupations of the modern aluminic production. Sibirskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal (Irkutsk). 2012; 6: 122–26. (in Russian)
  4. Rosly O.F., Gurvich V.B., Plotko E.G., Kuzmin S.V., Fedoruk A.A., Roslaya N.A. et al. Emerging issues concerning hygiene in the Russian aluminum industry. Meditsina Truda i Promyshlennaya Ekologiya. 2012; 11: 8–12. (in Russian)
  5. Chebotarev A.G., Duryagin I.N. Working conditions, risk of development of occupational diseases among employees of enterprises of the aluminum industry. Metallurg. 2013; 8: 4–7. (in Russian)
  6. Rosly O.F., Plotko E.G., Fedoruk A.A., Slyshkina T.V. Priority factors of occupational risk under the conditions of aluminum electrolysis. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya. 2013; 9: 19–21. (in Russian)
  7. Bodienkova G.M., Timofeeva S.S., Meshchakova N.M., Boklazhenko E.V. Working conditions and professional risks of health disorders in workers of the aluminum industry. [Usloviya truda i professional’nye riski narusheniy zdorov’ya u rabotnikov alyuminievoy promyshlennosti]. Irkutsk: Izd-vo RINITU; 2015. (in Russian)
  8. Syurin S.A Health state of aluminum industry workers in the European North of Russia. Gigiena i sanitaiya. 2015; 1: 68–72. (in Russian)
  9. Shaaban L.H., Zayet H.H., Aboufaddan H.H., Elghazally S.A. Respiratory hazards: clinical and functional assessment in aluminum industry workers. Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis. 2016; 65(2): 537–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcdt.2016.01.004
  10. Kondrik E.K., Sergeeva N.L., Kavyzina L.I. Ecologic and hygienic problems of aluminum factories. Gigiena i sanitariya. 1993; 8: 7–11. (in Russian)
  11. Benke G., Abramson M., Sim M. Exposures in the alumina and primary aluminium industry: An historical review. Annals of Occupational Hygiene. 1998; 42(3): 173–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/42.3.173
  12. Seixas N.S., Cohen M., Zevenbergen B., Cotey M., Carter S., Kaufman J. Urinary fluoride as an exposure index in aluminum smelting. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 2000; 61(1): 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298660008984520
  13. Sim M, Benke G. World at work: hazards and controls in aluminium potrooms. Occup Environ Med. 2003; 60(12): 989–92.
  14. Jelinic J.D., Nola I.A., Udovicic R., Ostoji´c D., Zuskin E. Exposure to chemical agents in aluminium potrooms. Med Lav. 2007; 98: 407–14.
  15. Dampilon Z.V. Influence of aluminium production in russia on the environment. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta. 2008; 3: 349–54. (in Russian)
  16. Dando N., Xu W., Peace J.N. Continuous measurement of peak hydrogen fluoride exposures in aluminum smelter potrooms: instrument development and in-plant evaluation. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 2008; 5: 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620701789884
  17. Zhoukov E.I., Korostovenko V.V., Shakhray S.G., Kondratev V.V. Sanitary-hygienic assessment of working zones air in the aluminum production building equipped by electrolysers with pre-baked anodes. Ekologiya i promyshlennost’ Rossii. 2012; 5: 9–11. (in Russian)
  18. Zakharenkov V.V., Oleshchenko A.M., Surzhikov D.V., Danilov I.P., Kislitsyna V.V., Korsakova T.G.Determination of the probability of the damage to the health of workers in aluminium production due to the exposure to toxic substances. Byulleten’ VSNTs SO RAMN. 2013; 3-2: 75–8. (in Russian)
  19. Susheela A.K., Mondal N.K., Singh A. Exposure to Fluoride in Smelter Workers in a Primary Aluminum Industry in India. International journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 2013; 4: 61-72.
  20. Shayakhmetov S.F., Lisetskaya L.G., Merinov A.V. Evaluation of toxic dust factor in aluminium production (analytic review). Meditsina Truda i Promyshlennaya Ekologiya. 2015; 4: 30–5. (in Russian)
  21. Zhang Y., Sun M., Hong J., Han X., He J., Shi W. Environmental footprint of aluminum production in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016; 133: 1242–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.137
  22. Borodina G.A. Hygienic estimation of modern technologies of obtaining aluminum and silicon. Sibirskij medicinskij zhurnal. 2009; 3: 122–24. (in Russian)
  23. Rosly O.F., Fedoruk A.A., Slyshkina T.V., Ustiancev S.L. Avaluation of occupational risks for health of worken in the production of electrolyzis of aluminium. Ural’skij medicinskij zhurnal. 2011; 9: 9–12. (in Russian)
  24. Chebotarev A.G., Duryagin I.N. Improvement of working conditions is important task to preserve health of employees of aluminum plants. Metallurg. 2017; 10: 9–12. (in Russian)
  25. Fedoruk A.A., Rosly O.F., Tsepilov N.A., Slyshkina T.V. Hygienic characteristics of working conditions in the operation of modern electrolytic cells high power. Ural’skij medicinskij zhurnal. 2008; 8: 139–43. (in Russian)
  26. Fedoruk A.A., Rosly O.F., Slyshkina T.V., Plotko E.G., Lemyasev M.F. Issues of occupational health in the aluminium plant with superpower equipment. Meditsina Truda i Promyshlennaya Ekologiya. 2012; 11: 13–7. (in Russian)
  27. Tabereaux A.T., Peterson R.D. Aluminum Production. In: Seetharaman S., ed. Treatise on Process Metallurgy: Vol. 3. Industrial Processes. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014: 839-917.
  28. Hoet P.M., Bruske-Hohlfeld I., Salata O.V. Nanoparticles – known and unknown health risks. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2004; 2: 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-2-12
  29. Onishchenko G.G. Organizing the supervision over the turnover of nanomaterials presenting a potential hazard to human health. Gigiena i sanitariya. 2011; 2: 4–9. (in Russian)
  30. Ulanova T.S., Antipyeva M.V., Zabirova M.I., Volkova M.V. Determination of nanoscale particles in the air of working zone at the metallurgical production. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2015; 1: 77–81. (in Russian)

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Shayakhmetov S.F., Meshchakova N.M., Lisetskaya L.G., Merinov A.V., Zhurba O.M., Alekseyenko A.N., Rukavishnikov V.S., 2024



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.