Prior assessment of the occupational health risk according to workers’ subjective perception of work hardness

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

Introduction. The hardness and intensity of working process assessment is the actual cause at least in 20 % of workers in the country employed in workplace settings with hard working conditions. Hygienic assessment of working conditions makes it possible to perform prior assessment of occupational health risks and to predict prevalence of negative health outcomes. The application of survey method is also actual taking into account the existing difficulties in the practical implementation of existing approaches to assessing the hardness of work. Objective of the study is to perform prior health risk assessment based on analyzing workers’ subjective perception of work severity. Materials and methods. Hygienic assessment of work hardness was performed using the existing approaches and by analyzing workers’ subjective perception of this factor, considering indicators and their criteria fixed in the valid Guideline 2.2.2006–05. To assess the effectiveness of the proposed approach in comparison with the analysis of time-lapse data, the calculation of indices of the validity of the results (sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and accuracy) was performed. Prior occupational health risk levels were assessed in accordance with the Guideline 2.2.3969–23. There was created a sample included workers employed at a bearing production (n=95, age is 45.1±1.2 years, work experience in a given occupation is 16.5±1.4 years, 85% of workers were men). Results. Workers’ subjective perception of work hardness was analyzed using a specially designed questionnaire and an automated calculation template. The suggested approach turned out to be highly sensitive (94%), to have high prognostic value (84%) and accuracy (80%) in comparison with the conventional time study. Using workers employed at a bearing production as an example, we revealed priority indicators describing work hardness and established classes of working conditions. Prior health risk levels were unacceptable in 92.6 % cases and slightly different from the results obtained by time studies (83.2%, р=0.07). Limitations. A prior health risk assessment results cannot be extrapolated for other occupations with another working conditions. Conclusion. Subjective perception of a factor can be used in preliminary hygienic assessment of work hardness and following prior assessment of occupational health risks. To prevent negative health outcomes and minimize health risks for workers employed at a bearing production, it is advisable to consider the results of this study when making relevant managerial decisions.

作者简介

Darya Lir

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies of the Federal Service for Surveillance over Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing; Academician E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: lir@fcrisk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7738-6832

MD, PhD, leading researcher, head of the Dept. of the analysis of risks to public health, Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Technologies for Public Health Risk Management; Associate Professor of the Department of hygiene of the medical and preventive faculty of the Academician E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University; 614990, Perm, Russian Federation

e-mail: lir@fcrisk.ru

俄罗斯联邦

Pavel Shur

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies of the Federal Service for Surveillance over Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing

Email: shur@fcrisk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5171-3105

MD, PhD, DSci., chief researcher, Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Technologies for Public Health Risk Management, 614045, Perm, Russian Federation

e-mail: shur@fcrisk.ru

俄罗斯联邦

Nina Zaitseva

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies of the Federal Service for Surveillance over Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing

Email: znv@fcrisk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2356-1145

MD, PhD, DSci., Professor, Scientific Director of the Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Technologies for Public Health Risk Management, Perm, 614045, Russian Federation

e-mail: znv@fcrisk.ru

俄罗斯联邦

Vadim Alekseev

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies of the Federal Service for Surveillance over Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing

Email: root@fcrisk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5850-7232

MD, PhD, DSci., Director of the Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Technologies for Public Health Risk Management, Perm, 614045, Russian Federation

e-mail: root@fcrisk.ru

俄罗斯联邦

Tatyana Novikova

Saratov Medical Scientific Center of the Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies

Email: novikovata-saratov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1463-0559

MD, PhD, DSci., leading researcher, head of the Lab. of occupational hygiene and general pathology, Saratov Medical Research Center, Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Technologies for Public Health Risk Management, Saratov, 410022, Russian Federation

e-mail: novikovata-saratov@yandex.ru

俄罗斯联邦

Anastasiya Barg

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies of the Federal Service for Surveillance over Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing; Perm State National Research University

Email: an-bg@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2901-3932

MD, PhD, senior scientific researcher of the Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Technologies for Public Health Risk Management, Perm, 614045, Russian Federation, Associate Professor of the Department of sociology of the Perm State National Research University, Perm, 614068, Russian Federation

e-mail: an-bg@yandex.ru

俄罗斯联邦

Ekaterina Khrushcheva

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies of the Federal Service for Surveillance over Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing

Email: khrusheva@fcrisk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2107-8993

Senior researcher, head of the Lab. of methods and technologies for risk management of the Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Technologies for Public Health Risk Management, Perm, 614045, Russian Federation

e-mail: khrusheva@fcrisk.ru

俄罗斯联邦

参考

  1. Федеральная служба государственной статистики. Официальная статистика. Рынок труда, занятость и заработная плата. Условия труда. Доступно: https://rosstat.gov.ru/working_conditions
  2. Государственный доклад «О состоянии санитарно-эпидемиологического благополучия населения в Российской Федерации в 2022 году». М.; 2023.
  3. Чеботарев А.Г., Матюхин В.В. Тяжесть и напряжённость труда работников при добыче полезных ископаемых, меры профилактики. Горная промышленность. 2013; (4): 66–72. https://elibrary.ru/rbjdfj
  4. Сюрин С.А., Горбанев С.А. Условия труда и профессиональная патология горняков Кольского Заполярья. Медицина труда и промышленная экология. 2020; 60(7): 456–61. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2020-60-7-456-461 https://elibrary.ru/sndkhh
  5. Фадеев А.Г., Горяев Д.В., Зайцева Н.В., Шур П.З., Редько С.В., Фокин В.А. Нарушения здоровья работников, связанные с факторами риска условий труда в горнодобывающей промышленности Арктической зоны (аналитический обзор). Анализ риска здоровью. 2023; (1): 184–93. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2023.1.17 https://elibrary.ru/rfwbxm
  6. Hassan O.M., Bayomy H. Occupational respiratory and musculoskeletal symptoms among Egyptian female hairdressers. J. Community Health. 2015; 40(4): 670–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-014-9983-y
  7. Kumar R., Pal L., Moom N. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorder among computer bank office employees in Punjab (India): a case study. Procedia Manuf. 2015; (3): 6624–31.
  8. Данилов А.Н., Безрукова Г.А., Новикова Т.А. Тяжесть трудового процесса как детерминанта профессионального риска здоровью работников сельского хозяйства. Медицина труда и промышленная экология. 2017; 57(9): 59. https://elibrary.ru/zfqjdb
  9. Кочетова О.А., Малькова Н.Ю. Изучение условий труда у лиц с профессиональной полиневропатией верхних конечностей. Гигиена и санитария. 2017; 96(7): 636–40. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2017-96-7-636-640 https://elibrary.ru/zfbyvd
  10. Abdelsalam A., Wassif G.O., Eldin W.S., Abdel-Hamid M.A., Damaty S.I. Frequency and risk factors of musculoskeletal disorders among kitchen workers. J. Egypt. Public Health Assoc. 2023; 98(1): 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42506-023-00128-6
  11. Abishek C., Binoosh S.A. Analysis of musculoskeletal risk among railway mail service workers. Industrial Engineering Journal. 2023; 52(5): 156–66.
  12. Зибарев Е.В., Бухтияров И.В., Вальцева Е.А., Токарев А.В. Оценка показателей напряжённости труда и факторов, влияющих на утомление у пилотов гражданской авиации по результатам анкетирования. Медицина труда и промышленная экология. 2021; 61(6): 356–64. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2021-61-6-356-364 https://elibrary.ru/vtnhxu
  13. Шур П.З., Лир Д.Н., Алексеев В.Б., Барг А.О., Виндокуров И.В., Хрущева Е.В. Напряжённость трудового процесса и его модификация на фоне реализации противоэпидемических мероприятий. Гигиена и санитария. 2023; 102(10): 1069–77. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-10-1069-1077 https://elibrary.ru/aifvrz
  14. Алексеев В.Б., Шур П.З., Лир Д.Н., Фокин В.А. Количественная оценка риска здоровью, обусловленного напряжённостью трудового процесса. Гигиена и санитария. 2021; 100(10): 1171–8. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-10-1171-1178 https://elibrary.ru/olaeiq
  15. Зайцева Н.В., Шур П.З., Лир Д.Н., Алексеев В.Б., Барг А.О., Виндокуров И.В. и др. Методические подходы персонифицированной оценки риска здоровью, обусловленного напряженностью трудового процесса. Анализ риска здоровью. 2023; (3): 102–11. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2023.3.10 https://elibrary.ru/zyaesi
  16. Трухачева Н.В. Математическая статистика в медико-биологических исследованиях с применением пакета Statistica. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2012. https://elibrary.ru/qmbnon
  17. Золина З.М., Измеров Н.Ф. Руководство по физиологии труда. М.: Медицина; 1983.
  18. Бухтияров И.В., Юшкова О.И., Ходжиев М., Капустина А.В., Форверц А.Ю. Физиологические критерии в совершенствовании классификации напряжённости труда для задач оценки профессионального риска. Анализ риска здоровью. 2021; (1): 90–9. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2021.1.09 https://elibrary.ru/qrhkve
  19. Бурак В.Е., Донцов С.А., Платонов Л.А. Оценка тяжести трудового процесса на рабочем месте. XXI век: итоги прошлого и проблемы настоящего плюс. 2022; 11(2): 125–30. https://doi.org/10.46548/21vek-2022-1158-0022
  20. Попова А.Ю., Брагина И.В., Зайцева Н.В., Май И.В., Шур П.З., Митрохин О.В. и др. О научно-методическом обеспечении оценки результативности и эффективности контрольно-надзорной деятельности Федеральной службы в сфере защиты прав потребителей и благополучия человека. Гигиена и санитария. 2017; 96(1): 5–9. https://doi.org/10.18821/0016-9900-2017-96-1-5-9 https://elibrary.ru/vveocj
  21. Малькова Н.Ю., Чернушевич Н.И. Изучение условий труда в профессиях с различной степенью тяжести трудового процесса. Вестник Санкт-Петербургской государственной медицинской академии им. И.И. Мечникова. 2009; (4): 140–4. https://elibrary.ru/nrlwal

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Lir D.N., Shur P.Z., Zaitseva N.V., Alekseev V.B., Novikova T.А., Barg A.O., Khrushcheva E.V., 2024


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.