Effect of TopDressing on Chlorophyll Content in Barley Leaves and Its Relation to Grain Quality Parameters

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The effect of top-dressing at tillage phase by Polydon® Amino Start organomineral fertilizer and KAS-28 liquid mineral fertilizer on the state of the leaf pigment complex of spring barley cv. Novichok, Rodnik Prikamya and Pamyati Rodinoy and its relationship with grain quality parameters was studied under field conditions of the Kirov region of the Russian Federation in 2020–2022. Significant effect of top-dress treatments on pigment content in the flag and second leaves was revealed. The use of top-dressing with KAS-28 enhanced the association of grain quality parameters with the chlorophyll pigment content of the two upper leaves compared to the control variant. The effect of Amino Start was not uniform: some of the connections were somewhat weakened compared to the control, some intensified, and some became statistically significant. The total content of chlorophyll correlated with the content of cellulose and fat in the grain in all treatments. Compared to controls, the use of top-dress treatments altered the effectiveness of using of photoassimilates of both leaves for cellulose and fat synthesis. The obtained data indicate the possibility of predicting the content of the main parameters of spring barley’s grain quality by the content of chlorophyll pigments in flag or second leaves of plants during the flowering phase.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

E. Noskova

Rudnitsky Federal Agricultural Research Center of the NorthEast

Email: edaphic@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, ul. Lenina 166а, Kirov 610007

E. Lisitsyn

Rudnitsky Federal Agricultural Research Center of the NorthEast

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: edaphic@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦, ul. Lenina 166а, Kirov 610007

参考

  1. Naibaho J., Korzeniowska M., Wojdyło A., Figiel A., Yang B., Laaksonen O., Foste M., Vilu R., Viiard E. The potential of spent barley as a functional food ingredient: study on the comparison of dietary fiber and bioactivity // Proceedings. 2021. V. 70. № 1. Art. 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods_2020-08486
  2. Biel W., Jacyno E. Chemical composition and nutritive value of spring hulled barley varieties // Bulgar. J. Agricult. Sci. 2013. V. 19. № 4. P. 721–727.
  3. Towfiq S.I., Abdulqader S.H., Ahmad K.R., Hama S.J. Response of grain yield and its components to organic matter and removal of some photosynthetic organs of durum wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in two years of Sulaimani – Iraq region // Int. J. Plant Anim. Environ. Sci. 2015. № 5. P. 134–140.
  4. LópezBellido R.J., Shepherd C.E., Barraclough P.B. Pedicting post–anthesis N requeriments of bread wheat with Minolta SPAD meter // Eur. J. Agron. 2004. V. 20. № 3. P. 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(03)00025-X
  5. Racz I., Hirişcău D., Berindean I., Kadar R., Muntean E., Tritean N., Russu F., Ona A., Muntean L. The influence of flag leaf removal and its characteristics on main yield components and yield quality indices on wheat // Agronomy. 2022. V. 12. № 10. Art. 2545. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102545
  6. Vicente R., VergaraDíaz O., Medina S., Chairi F., Kefauver S.C., Bort J., Serret M.D., Aparicio N., Araus J.L. Durum wheat ears perform better than the flag leaves under water stress: Gene expression and physiological evidence // Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018. V. 153. P. 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.06.004
  7. FuertesMendizábal T., Estavillo J.M., Duñabeitia M.K., Huérfano X., Castellón A., González Murua C., Aizpurua A., GonzálezMoro M.B.15N natural abundance evidences a better use of N sources by late nitrogen application in bread wheat // Front. Plant Sci. 2018. V. 9. Art. 853. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00853
  8. Jaeger A., Zannini E., Sahin A.W., Arendt E.K. Barley Protein properties, extraction and applications, with a focus on brewers’ spent grain protein // Foods. 2021. V. 10. Art. 1389. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061389
  9. Aranguren M., Castellón A., Aizpurua A. Wheat grain protein content under mediterranean conditions measured with chlorophyll meter // Plants. 2021. V. 10. Art. 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10020374
  10. Kendal E. Relationship between chlorophyll and other features in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) using SPAD and biplot analyses // J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 2015. V. 17. № 7. P. 1873–1886. http://jast.modares.ac.ir/article-23-8081-en.html
  11. Ghassemi–Golezani K., Mousavi S.A. Improving physiological performance and grain yield of maize by salicylic acid treatment under drought stress // J. Plant Physiol. Breed. 2022. V. 12. № 2. P. 1–10. https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/jppb.2022.16041
  12. Noskova E.N., Lisitsyn E.M., Shchennikova I.N., Svetlakova E.V. Top-dressing treatment of spring barley to modify its quality // Food. Raw Mater. 2023. V. 11. № 1. P. 106–115. https://doi.org/10.21603/2308-4057-2023-1-562
  13. Абашев В.Д., Светлакова Е.В., Попов Ф.А., Носкова Е.Н., Денисова А.В. Влияние возрастающих доз и соотношений минеральных удобрений на урожайность и качество зерна ячменя // Аграрн. наука ЕвроСевероВостока. 2016. № 1. C. 24–30.
  14. Семенюк О.В. Эффективность применения жидких органоминеральных удобрений ПОЛИДОН® и стимулятора роста растений Альфастим® на посевах озимой пшеницы // Земледелие. 2017. № 1. С. 44–46.
  15. Sundaram P.K., Mani I., Lande S.D., Parray R.A. Evaluation of urea ammonium nitrate application on the performance of wheat // Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2019. V. 8. № 1. P. 1956–1963. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.801.205
  16. Есаулко А.Н., Гарибджанян Г.А., Голосной Е.В., Громова Н.В. Эффективность применения жидких и твердых азотных минеральных удобрений в ранневесеннюю подкормку посевов озимой пшеницы // Земледелие. 2020. № 3. С. 38–40. https://doi.org/10.24411/0044-3913-2020-10310
  17. Lichtenthaler Н.К., Buschmann C. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV–VIS spectroscopy // Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry (CPFA) / Eds. Wrolstad R.E., Acree T.E., An H., Decker E.A., Penner M.H., Reid D.S., Schwartz S.J., Shoemaker C.F., Sporns P.N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons, 2001. F4.3.1–F4.3.8. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142913.faf0403s01
  18. Филиппов Е.Г., Донцова А.А., Донцов Д.П., Буланова А.А., Игнатьева Н.Г. Качество зерна коллекционных образцов озимого ячменя // Зерн. хоз-во России. 2018. № 3. С. 39–43. https://doi.org/10.31367/2079-8725-2018-57-3-39-43
  19. Ortiz L.T., Velasco S., Treviño J., Jiménez B., Rebolé A. Changes in the nutrient composition of barley grain (Hordeum vulgare L.) and of morphological fractions of sprouts // Scientifica. 2021. V. 2021. Art. 9968864. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9968864
  20. Ain H.B.U., Saeed F., Ahmad N., Imran A., Niaz B., Afzaal M, Imran M., Tufail T., Javed A. Functional and healthendorsing properties of wheat and barley cell wall’s non-starch polysaccharides // Inter. J. Food Propert. 2018. V. 21. № 1. P. 1463–1480. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2018.1489837
  21. Сумина А.В., Полонский В.И. Содержание ценных веществ в зерне ячменя, выращенного в контрастных климатических условиях // Сибир. вестн. сел.-хоз. науки. 2020. Т. 50. № 1. С. 23–31. https://doi.org/10.26898/0370-8799-2020-1-3
  22. Izydorczyk M., Nam S., Sharma A., Kletke J. Exploring dry grain fractionation as a means to valorize high-protein malting barley // Cereal Chem. 2021. V. 98. P. 840–850. https://doi.org/10.1002/cche.10426
  23. Havrlentova M., Babulicová M., Dyulgerova B., Hendrichová J., Valcheva D., Vulchev D., Hašana R. Grain quality of spring barley genotypes grown at agro-ecological conditions of the Slovak Republic and the Republic of Bulgaria // J. Centr. Eur. Agricult. 2020. V. 21. № 4. P. 775–788. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/21.4.2980
  24. Николаев П.Н., Юсова О.А., Аниськов Н.И., Сафонова И.В. Агробиологическая характеристика голозерных сортов ячменя селекции Омского АНЦ // Тр. по прикл. бот., генет. и селекции. 2019. T. 180. № 1. С. 38–43. https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2019-1-38-43
  25. Biel W., Kazimierska K., Bashutska U. Nutritional value of wheat, triticale, barley and oat grains // Acta Sci. Pol. Zootech. 2020. V. 19. № 2. P. 19–28. https://doi.org/10.21005/asp.2020.19.2.03
  26. Nagata N., Tanaka R., Tanaka A. The major route for chlorophyll synthesis includes [3,8-divinyl]-chlorophyllide a reduction in Arabidopsis thaliana // Plant Cell Physiol. 2007. V. 48. P. 1803–1808. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcm153
  27. Momen M.B.H., Razzak A., Rahman T.M.R., Yasmin M.N., Salahin M., Khan T.A., Islam M.R. Improvement of leaf chlorophyll content and yield of maize through calibration of optimum basal and top dressing urea // Inter. J. Asian Contempor. Res. 2022. V. 2(3). P. 80–86.
  28. Zhou X., Kono Y., Win A., Matsui T., Tanaka T.S.T. Predicting withinfield variability in grain yield and protein content of winter wheat using UAV-based multispectral imagery and machine learning approa-ches // Plant Prod. Sci. 2020. V. 24. № 2. P. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2020.1819165
  29. Acreche M.M., Slafer G.A. Variation of grain nitrogen content in relation with grain yield in old and modern Spanish wheats grown under a wide range of agronomic conditions in a Mediterranean region // J. Agric. Sci. 2009. V. 147. P. 657–667. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859609990190
  30. Argenta G., Silva P.R.F., Bortolini C.G., Forsthofer E.L., Strieder M.L. Relationship of reading with the chlorophyll content of chlorophyll and extractable nitrogen in maize leaf // Rev. Bras. Fisiol. Veg. 2001. V. 13. P. 158–167.
  31. Izquierdo N., Aguirrezábal L. Genetic variability in the response of fatty acid composition to minimum night temperature during grain filling in sunflower // Field Crop Res. 2008. V. 106. № 2. P. 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.10.016

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © The Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024