<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">V.F.Snegirev Archives of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">V.F.Snegirev Archives of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Архив акушерства и гинекологии им. В.Ф. Снегирева</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2313-8726</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2687-1386</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">35457</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18821/2313-8726-2018-5-2-93-96</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Original study articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Оригинальные исследования</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="zh"><subject>Original study articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">BIPOLAR VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY IN THE FUTURE AND PRESENT</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>БИПОЛЯРНАЯ ВЛАГАЛИЩНАЯ ГИСТЕРЭКТОМИЯ - БУДУЩЕЕ И НАСТОЯЩЕЕ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Slobodyanyuk</surname><given-names>A. I</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Слободянюк</surname><given-names>А. И</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ishchenko</surname><given-names>Anton A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ищенко</surname><given-names>Антон Анатольевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, PhD, Head of the Department of Oncogynecology of the University Clinical Hospital No. 4 of the I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. мед. наук, зав. отделением онкогинекологии Университетской клинической больницы № 4 ФГАОУ ВО «Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет им. И.М. Сеченова» Минздрава России (Сеченовский университет), 119991, г. Москва</p></bio><email>ra2001_2001@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ishchenko</surname><given-names>A. I</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ищенко</surname><given-names>А. И</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Slobodyanyuk</surname><given-names>B. A</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Слободянюк</surname><given-names>Б. А</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Zhukovskaya Municipal Clinical Hospital</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ГБУЗ МО «Жуковская городская клиническая больница»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГАОУ ВО «Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет им. И.М. Сеченова» Минздрава России (Сеченовский университет), Клиника акушерства и гинекологии им. В.Ф. Снегирёва</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff3"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Clinical diagnostic center MEDSI</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Клинико-диагностический центр МЕДСИ</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2018-06-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>06</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 5, NO2 (2018)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 5, №2 (2018)</issue-title><fpage>93</fpage><lpage>96</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-07-21"><day>21</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2018, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2018, ООО "Эко-Вектор"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО "Эко-Вектор"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://archivog.com/2313-8726/article/view/35457">https://archivog.com/2313-8726/article/view/35457</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Vaginal hysterectomy seems to be the optimal access, but this method does not take a worthy place in operative gynecology. In this study, a prospective comparison of 2 different techniques of vaginal hysterectomy was performed in 125 patients with the use of vicryl ligatures and 215 patients using bipolar coagulation devices (Gyrus and Emed) in different clinics. In the analysis of immediate and remote results, in the group with electrosurgery, blood loss, operation time and pain syndrome at 4 and 48 hours were found to be statistically significantly less. Also, we did not discern any differences in the number of postoperative complications, which allows us to make conclusions regarding the safety and effectiveness of the use of modern bipolar coagulation devices by experienced surgeons.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Влагалищная гистерэктомия представляется оптимальным доступом, однако этот метод не занимает достойного места в оперативной гинекологии. В данном исследовании проведено проспективное сравнение 2 различных методик вагинальной гистерэктомии: 125 пациенток с применением викриловых лигатур и 215 пациенток - с применением биполярных коагулирующих устройств (Gyrus и Emed) в разных клиниках. При анализе непосредственных и отдалённых результатов выявлено, что в группе с применением электрохирургии кровопотеря, время операции и болевой синдром через 4 и 48 ч были статистически значимо меньше. Также мы не выявили различий в количестве послеоперационных осложнений, что позволяет сделать вывод относительно безопасности и эффективности применения современных биполярных коагулирующих устройств опытными хирургами.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>vaginal hysterectomy</kwd><kwd>bipolar coagulation</kwd><kwd>omission of the walls of the vagina</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>влагалищная гистерэктомия</kwd><kwd>биполярная коагуляция</kwd><kwd>опущение стенок влагалища</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Kovac S.R. Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000; 95: 787-93.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Wu J.M., Wechter M.E., Geller E.J., Nguyen T.V., Visco A.G. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 110: 1091-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Aart J.W., Nieboer T.E., Johnson N., Tavender E., Garry R., Mol B.J., Kluivers K.B. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological diseases. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015; 8; CD003677; DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 114: 1156-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Отт Д.О. Оперативная гинекология. Санкт-Петербург; 1914.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Fitz-Gerald A.L., Tan J., Chan K.W., Polyakov A., Edwards G.N., Najjar H., Tsaltas J., Vollenhoven B. Comparison of ultrasonic shears and traditional suture ligature for vaginal hysterectomy: randomized controlled trial. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2013; 20(6): 853-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Chekan E.G., Davison M.A., Singleton D.W., Mennone J.Z., Hinoul P. Consistency and sealing of advanced bipolar tissue sealers. Med. Devices (Auckl). 2015; 8: 193-9. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S79642.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Macario A., Dexter F., Sypal J., Cosgriff N., Heniford В.Т. Operative time and other outcomes of the electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing system (LigaSure) versus other methods for surgical hemostasis: a meta-analysis. Surg. Innov. 2008; 15(4): 284-91.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Breivik H., Borchgrevink P.C., Allen S.M., Rosseland L.A., Romimdstad L., Hals E.K. et al. Assessment of pain. Br. J. Anaesth. 2008; 101 (1): 17-24. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen103.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Zakaria М.А., Levy B.S. Outpatient vaginal hysterectomy: optimizing perioperative management for same-day discharge. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012; 120(6): 1355-61.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
