Ovarian masses in pregnant women: clinical and morphological characteristics and the importance of ultrasound monitoring
- Authors: Ignatko I.V.1, Yanukyan K.V.1, Pashkov V.M.1, Lebedev V.A.1, Timokhina E.V.1, Belousova V.S.1, Bogomazova I.M.1, Pitskhelauri E.G.1, Kuzmina T.E.1, Churganova A.A.1, Fedyunina I.A.1, Kardanova M.A.1, Pesegova S.V.1, Samusevich A.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
- Issue: Vol 13, No 2 (2026)
- Pages: 169-176
- Section: Original study articles
- Submitted: 10.03.2026
- Accepted: 17.03.2026
- Published: 06.05.2026
- URL: https://archivog.com/2313-8726/article/view/703862
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/aog703862
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TKFGRW
- ID: 703862
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ovarian masses are a common condition in pregnant women, but their timely diagnosis is often challenging due to anatomical and physiological changes associated with uterine and fetal growth.
AIM: To analyze the clinical and morphological features of ovarian masses in pregnant women and to evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasound at different gestational ages.
METHODS: The study included 45 pregnant women with ovarian masses who underwent clinical, anamnestic, and ultrasound evaluation. Management strategies, histological findings, and perinatal outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS: The mean patient age was 30.6 ± 4.3 years, and the mean ovarian mass dimensions were 56.6 ± 28.7 mm × 49.0 ± 24.9 mm. In 62.2% of cases, ovarian masses were detected only after delivery. Histological examination of resected specimens revealed that the most common finding (17.8%) was mature teratoma. Expectant management was adopted in 53.3% of patients, with spontaneous regression in all these cases. All patients had favorable perinatal outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Delayed diagnosis of ovarian masses highlights the need for mandatory adnexal examination as part of the prenatal ultrasound protocol, as well as for improved visualization techniques and increased clinician awareness to optimize management of these patients.
Full Text
About the authors
Irina V. Ignatko
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: ignatko_i_v@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9945-3848
SPIN-code: 8073-1817
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowKseniya V. Yanukyan
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: ks24101@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-4745-396X
SPIN-code: 8242-4714
Russian Federation, Moscow
Vladimir M. Pashkov
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: pashkov_v_m@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3768-7822
SPIN-code: 7572-4791
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowVladimir A. Lebedev
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: lebedev_v_a@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3302-5533
SPIN-code: 6784-4855
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowElena V. Timokhina
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: timokhina_i_m@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6628-0023
SPIN-code: 4946-8849
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowVera S. Belousova
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: belousova_v_s@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8332-7073
SPIN-code: 6026-9008
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowIrina M. Bogomazova
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Author for correspondence.
Email: bogomazova_i_m@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1156-7726
SPIN-code: 9414-1218
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowElena G. Pitskhelauri
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: pitskhelauri_e_g@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9634-1541
SPIN-code: 9593-7483
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowTatiana E. Kuzmina
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: kuzmina_t_ye@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9649-5383
SPIN-code: 7198-1382
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowAnastasia A. Churganova
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: churganova_a_a@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9398-9900
SPIN-code: 3872-7167
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowIrina A. Fedyunina
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: fedyunina_i_a@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9661-5338
SPIN-code: 1929-5879
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowMadina A. Kardanova
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: kardanova_m_a@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4315-0717
SPIN-code: 3895-9666
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowSvetlana V. Pesegova
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: pesegova_s_v@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1339-5422
SPIN-code: 8891-9490
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowAnastasia N. Samusevich
Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: samusevich_a_n@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1102-2737
SPIN-code: 6765-3839
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Kim J, Lim J, Sohn JW, et al. Diagnostic imaging of adnexal masses in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2023;66(3):133–148. doi: 10.5468/ogs.22287 EDN: WUGBOC
- Gaughran J, Magee C, Mitchell S, et al. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: a single-centre prospective observational cohort study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(19):2182. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192182 EDN: OSLVIK
- Hakoun AM, AbouAl-Shaar I, Zaza KJ, et al. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: An updated review. Avicenna J Med. 2017;7(4):153–157. doi: 10.4103/ajm.AJM_22_17
- Cathcart AM, Nezhat FR, Emerson J, et al. Adnexal masses during pregnancy: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(6):601–612. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.11.1291 EDN: LMYUKT
- Sunder A, Darwish B, Darwish A, et al. Adnexal masses in pregnancy: An overview. Ginekologia i Poloznictwo. 2022;17(1):1–7.
- Romiti A, Moro F, Ricci L, et al. Using IOTA terminology to evaluate fetal ovarian cysts: analysis of 51 cysts over 10-year period. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;61(3):408-414. doi: 10.1002/uog.26061 EDN: YQBGXA
- Lee GS, Hur SY, Shin JC, et al. Elective vs. conservative management of ovarian tumors in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;85(3):250–254. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2003.12.008
- Barinov SV, Gachkailo IA, Lazareva OV, Shkabarnya LL. Surgical treatment of benign ovarian tumors during pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020;(S1):50–55. doi: 10.18565/aig.2020.1suppl.50-55 EDN: TALSAG
- Dobrokhotova YuE, Payanidi YuG, Borovkova EI, et al. Malignant ovarian tumors in pregnant women. Russian Medical Journal. 2019;27(6):45–52. EDN: KYHGTF
- Lee SJ, Oh HR, Na S, et al. Ultrasonographic ovarian mass scoring system for predicting malignancy in pregnant women with ovarian mass. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022;65(1):1–13. doi: 10.5468/ogs.21212 EDN: JNRNOA
- Kadrekar AR, Patel AS. Postpartum ovarian torsion caused by a large mucinous cystadenoma: a rare case study. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024;13(11):3355–3358. doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20243020 EDN: LEVWUY
- Testa AC, Mascilini F, Quagliozzi L, et al. Management of ovarian masses in pregnancy: patient selection for interventional treatment. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021;31(6):899–906. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001996 EDN: SMDQMA
- Bernhard LM, Klebba PK, Gray DL, Mutch DG. Predictors of persistence of adnexal masses in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(4):585–589. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00490-6
Supplementary files

