A study of the impact of the initial reagent’s chemical nature on the mechanochemical synthesis of silver-substituted hydroxyapatite

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Samples of hydroxyapatite with the substitution of calcium ions for silver ions were obtained by the mechanochemical method using silver nitrate and silver phosphate substituent ions as sources. The samples were characterised using X-ray diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy. It was observed that the use of AgNO3 resulted in the presence of residual nitrate in the synthesis products. Conversely, the use of Ag3PO4 enabled the obtaining of single-phase silver-substituted carbonate-hydroxyapatite. The introduction of silver cations in the position of calcium cations was found to increase the parameters of the hydroxyapatite crystal lattice.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

S. Makarova

Institute of State Chemistry and Mechanochemistry SB RAS

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: makarova@solid.nsc.ru
Ресей, Novosibirsk, 630090

I. Borodulina

Institute of State Chemistry and Mechanochemistry SB RAS

Email: makarova@solid.nsc.ru
Ресей, Novosibirsk, 630090

N. Eremina

Institute of State Chemistry and Mechanochemistry SB RAS

Email: makarova@solid.nsc.ru
Ресей, Novosibirsk, 630090

I. Prosanov

Institute of State Chemistry and Mechanochemistry SB RAS

Email: makarova@solid.nsc.ru
Ресей, Novosibirsk, 630090

N. Bulina

Institute of State Chemistry and Mechanochemistry SB RAS

Email: makarova@solid.nsc.ru
Ресей, Novosibirsk, 630090

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Habraken W., Habibovic P., Epple M. et al. // Mater. Today. 2016. V. 19. № 2. P. 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.008
  2. Dorozhkin S.V. // Acta Biomater. 2012. V. 8. № 3. P. 963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.09.003
  3. Supova M. // Ceram. Int. 2015. V. 41. № 8. P. 9203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.316
  4. Lim P.N., Chang L., San Thian E. // Nanomed.: Nano-technol., Biol., Med. 2015. V. 11. № 6. P. 1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2015.03.016
  5. Bellantone M., Williams H.D., Hench L.L. // Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002. V. 46. № 6. P. 1940. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.46.6.1940-1945.2002
  6. Bee S.L., Bustami Y., Ul-Hamid A. et al. // J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 2021. V. 32. № 106. P. 106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-021-06590-y
  7. Spadaro J.A., Berger T.J., Barranco S.D. et al. // Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1974. V. 6. № 5. P. 637. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.6.5.637
  8. Tite T., Popa A.C., Balescu L.M. et al. // Mater. 2018. V. 11. № 11. P. 2081. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112081
  9. Голованова О.А. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2023. Т. 68. № 3. С. 393. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22700155
  10. Денисова Л.Т., Молокеев М.С., Каргин Ю.Ф. и др. // Неорган. материалы. 2022. Т. 58. № 8. С. 861. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002337X22070089
  11. Stanic V., Janackovic D., Dimitrijevic S. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011. V. 257. № 9. P. 4510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.12.113
  12. Kim T.N., Feng Q.L., Kim J.O. et al. // J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. in Med. 1998. V. 9. P. 129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008811501734
  13. Rameshbabu N., Sampath Kumar T.S., Prabhakar T.G. et al. // J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A. 2007. V. 80. № 3. P. 581. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30958
  14. Samani S., Hossainalipour S.M., Tamizifar M. et al. // J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A. 2013. V. 101. № 1. P. 222. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34322
  15. Iconaru S.L., Chapon P., Le Coustumer P. et al. // Sci. World J. 2014. V. 2014. № 1. P. 165351. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/165351
  16. Honda M., Kawanobe Y., Ishii K. et al. // Mater. Sci. Eng.: C. 2013. V. 33. № 8. P. 5008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.08.026
  17. Fakharzadeh A., Ebrahimi-Kahrizsangi R., Nasiri-Tabrizi B. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2017. V. 43. № 15. P. 12588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.06.136
  18. Makarova S.V., Borodulina I.A., Prosanov I.Yu. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2023. V. 49. № 23. P. 37957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.09.125
  19. Chaikina M.V., Bulina N.V., Vinokurova O.B. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2019. V. 45. № 14. P. 16927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.239
  20. Chaikina M.V., Bulina N.V., Vinokurova O.B. et al. // Ceram. 2022. V. 5. № 3. P. 404. https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics5030031
  21. Никольский Б.П. Справочник химика. Т. 2. Основные свойства неорганических и органических соединений. Л.: Химия, 1971. 1168 с.
  22. Stahli C., Thuring J., Galea L. et al. // Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci., Cryst. Eng. Mater. 2016. V. 72. № 6. P. 875. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520616015675
  23. Макарова С.В., Булина Н.В., Просанов И.Ю. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2020. Т. 65. № 12. С. 1626. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X20120119
  24. Lafon J.P., Champion E., Bernache-Assollant D. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2008. V. 28. № 1. P. 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.06.009
  25. Chaikina M.V., Bulina N.V., Prosanov I.Y. et al. // Chem. Papers. 2023. V. 77. № 10. P. 5763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-023-02895-0
  26. Lide D.R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 90th edition. Oxfordshire: Taylor & Francis, 2009. 2828 p.
  27. Kwon Y.S., Gerasimov K.B., Yoon S.K. // J. Alloys Compd. 2002. V. 346. № 1–2. P. 276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(02)00512-1
  28. Marques C.F., Olhero S., Abrantes J.C.C. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2017. V. 43. № 17. P. 15719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.133
  29. Лурье Ю.Ю. Справочник по аналитической химии. М.: Химия, 1971.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Variation of diffractograms (a) and IR spectra (b) of samples of composition corresponding to reaction (1) at x = 1 during mechanochemical synthesis. The unmarked reflections refer to the HA phase.

Жүктеу (132KB)
3. Fig. 2. Variation of diffractograms (a) and IR spectra (b) of samples of composition corresponding to reaction (2) at x = 1 during mechanochemical synthesis. The unmarked reflections refer to the GA phase.

Жүктеу (144KB)
4. Fig. 3. Variation of unit cell parameters a (a) and c (b), its volume (c) and ROC (d) for the HA phase as a function of the time of mechanochemical treatment of samples of composition corresponding to reactions (1) and (2) at x = 1.

Жүктеу (71KB)
5. Fig. 4. Diffractograms (a) and IR spectra (b) of Ag-HA samples synthesized with different degrees of substitution x using Ag3PO4 (reaction (1)). The duration of synthesis is 30 min.

Жүктеу (137KB)
6. Fig. 5. Diffractograms (a) and IR spectra (b) of Ag-HA samples synthesized with different degrees of x substitution using AgNO3 (reaction (2)). The duration of synthesis is 30 min.

Жүктеу (133KB)
7. Fig. 6. Variation of a (a) and c (b) unit cell parameters of the Ag-GA phase, as well as ROC (c) using different sources of silver cations. The data for Ag2O are taken from [18].

Жүктеу (58KB)
8. Fig. 7. IR spectra (a) and diffractograms (b) of Ag-HA samples synthesized by reaction (1) after washing compared to the spectrum of unsubstituted HA.

Жүктеу (106KB)

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025